User talk:Tariqmia/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Tariqmia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  :) --Freemesm (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Freemesm, Thanks for the information. I am new but I am only a month behind you Tariqmia (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Your addition to Islamic Development Bank has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Darkness Shines, The annual report is not copyrighted as the information is released to the public domain by the Islamic Development Bank for the viewing of the general public. The WP:PD states that the public domain material is material “that were released into the public domain by the copyright holder”. On that basis, I believe that information can be included on the Wikipedia article. As a newcomer, I’d say the following are relevant: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers and WP:AGF. It will help to have a constructive discussion instead of the deletion, as information needs to be added to the Islamic Development Bank wikipage.

I will reverse your deletions and include the above discussion at the IDB talk page

I would strongly advise against reverting copyrighted content into Wikipedia. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Darkness Shines, Please state why you think it is copyrighted. As a newcomer, I have the right to know. Wikipedia:Civility states "Explain yourself". Tariqmia (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Lol, a new editor already spouting policy. See the article talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. 

Darkness Shines (talk) 21:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for meatpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee Notice

Dear Tariqmia, I wanted you to know that I also got a notice from User:Darkness Shines on my talk page that looks like yours. You should know that DS placed that banner incorrectly and it makes him look like an administrator. He is not an administrator. Moreover, it looks as though he is from of Arbitration Committee. Again he is not nor has he ever been a member of Arbitration Committee. Like me, you may have been doing something innocent, but the banner states unfairly, "If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic." This is boilerplate language given to anyone who gets this template. It does not mean in any way that you did something wrong. Furthermore, although there is very little information about this banner, you may remove it from your page. Your name was also listed by DS on a noticeboard. In my case, I believe this is wrong because I'm not interested in editing in this area. You are not being investigated in any way. As a protest I have written a strikethrough mark through my name at the following location. [1] If you are not happy about your treatment by DS or being listed, then I would encourage you to do the same. I hope I have clarified your situation as I had to find out more about mine and wanted to share the results with you. I wish you good editing in Wikipedia, Crtew (talk) 09:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)