Tanzania888

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

The text says that all 3 are comparable, Islam, Traditional African religion and Christianity. Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

I added the source which clearly shows Islam as major religion. see so It is not my ORIGINAL RESEARCH. as per your second wish i also added Other traditional believes so it is read as follows Islam is major religion followed by other traditional religions and Christianity. Tanzania888 (talk) 10:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

• Please note that while blocked, you cannot create other accounts to persist in the same type of editing that got you blocked, as you appear to have done with Dareislam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) —C.Fred (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Since you have evaded the block on this account, both by using another account and by editing without logging into an account, you have been blocked again, this time for 24 hours. If you evade blocks again, you may well be blocked indefinitely. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:54, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

You should be aware that your edits have not been in proper English. A reasonable degree of competence in English is needed in order to contribute to an English language encyclopaedia. (To give just one example, you have used "believes" as a noun, whereas it is only a verb".) As a native speaker of English, I can assure you that saying that Islam is the "major religion" of a place conveys the message that it is the religion of so large a majority as to be dominant in that place; it does not suggest that it is simply the religion of the largest minority, and certainly not that it is the largest minority by a fairly small margin. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

you were told above that if you evaded blocks again you might be blocked indefinitely, and so it will come as no surprise to you to learn that this account has indeed been blocked indefinitely. This is not only because of your block evasion, but also because of the disruptive nature of your editing, your edit warring, and your refusal to accept consensus and Wikipedia policies. If you continue in the same way, the articles you have been editing can be protected to prevent you from editing them, but this will cause inconvenience to constructive editors as well as to you, so please don't make it necessary. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)