Tankguy

Talk:M113 Armored Personnel Carrier/Archive 1

I am the only person who is going to see your comments on Talk:M113 Armored Personnel Carrier/Archive 1, as I created that page. It is an archived talk page, and should not be edited, as noted in the message box at the top of the page. If you have new concerns about the article as it is, then they should should be addressed at Talk:M113 Armored Personnel Carrier. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 22:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Posted relevant portions of comment onto correct page. Must learn to read one of these days. Tankguy 17:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

It happens. No one but me has that page on their watchlist, and it is only on mine since I recently archived it when it got too big. Personally, I thing Sparks is p*ssing in the wind, but that is his right. We removed a lot of Gavin stuff a while back, and left only the one statement. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 18:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC) PS- you might want to check my about page.

Talk:M113 Armored Personnel Carrier

Tankguy, I thought that you should be made aware of something. Several of your posts on the M113 discussion page have been replaced by user 74.190.30.53 with:

"1LT Sparks is an infantry officer in the USAR--which is not unusual for someone transferring from the National Guard. "Tankguy" is attempting to libel him out of emotional jealousy sans facts. Sparks actually works with the Army directly on M113 projects and is in the actual know of what is going on, not a lowly NCO like "tankguy" says he is. "Tankguy" is also hiding behind the internet to make his libelous insults whereas Sparks stands on his statements in public. If "tankguy" were to reveal his name he would be subject to UCMJ and legal action for slander (surely he is gossiping, too) libel and conduct unbecoming.

LTG Gavin was directly behind the development of the M113 and should be named after it."

Since you have not responded, I'd thought that you should be made aware of this.Vstr (talk) 18:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)