Taliryd
September 2018
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. (Swarm ♠ talk) 21:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Taliryd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #22771 was submitted on Sep 25, 2018 22:45:01. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 22:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Taliryd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I edited the images on the pages of the company I work for, Nuvo magazine and Montecristo magazine in order to update the image to the current issue, I understand now that the edits were violating your copyright policy, and the images had to be deleted. I would like you to reinstate the pages of NUVO Magazine and MONTECRISTO magazine to before Monday 25th of September, it was an accident I thought that my edits were legal since I posted the picture on wikicommons. But I did not touch the text content of the page and that was deleted to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taliryd (talk • contribs) 00:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No, definitely not. You've just admitted to violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and our terms of use. Yamla (talk) 10:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You would be wise to review our paid contribution disclosure policy while you are waiting for an administrator to review your block. TheDragonFire (talk) 04:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Taliryd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I admit to failing to comply with the promotion policy as I promoted the magazine, conflict of interest policy as an intern for the pages I edited, I don’t think I violated the paid contribution discloser as I am an intern and am not paid, I was wondering if I could be unblock I understand what I did wrong and did not fully understand your policies which I now do. I promise not to edit pages and will only suggest edit. My edits were done in good faith as I wanted to update the pages but was not aware that I was violating your policy but I know that now. I would like to request if possible that the pages be reinstate to how they were before I edited them as I promise not to touch them. Thank you.
Decline reason:
No response to 331dot in a week. Please feel free to open a new request when you are able to interact. SQLQuery me! 13:55, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please note that WP:PAID states "Interns are considered employees for this purpose". You must still comply with that policy. Aside from suggesting edits, do you want to edit about anything else? 331dot (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)