Welcome! edit

Welcome to Wikipedia


Hello, TXLonghorn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Created per support in Wikipedia:Esperanza/Proposals#Smile_campaign. Requesting feedback. Feel free to change the wording to sound better. There was a TFD debate for this template early that had no consensus, but a main conflict of the template was that people were merely spamming it. If you use this template, please add a friendly message with it so people do not regard it simply as spam. Thanks.
Note: the template won't work properly without the subst.

EvocativeIntrigue has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!


Hi there,

I noticed you did a large amount of work on Four Dead in Five Seconds Gunfight and thought you'd appreciate a look now I've 'Wikified' and added some more content.

Paste any feedback you may have on my talk page!

Kindest Regards,

EvocativeIntrigue 22:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

2nd June edit

Hi!

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I'm glad to see someone with such a great, friendly attitude join Wikipedia!I'm glad you liked the article, it took quite a while.

Most of the things you'll need to know about styling are in the manual of style, but the tutorial is quite useful for learning the basics. Other than that, the best way to learn is to look at coding in other articles or ask other users for help- I'm more than happy to help as far as I can, just email me or leave a message on my talk page.

Here's a few other links you may find useful:

  • If you do recent changes patrolling, you may find the administrator intervention against vandalism page useful for alerting admins to IP addresses or other users that have been vandalising Wikipedia. There's more help for this on the page itself.
{{subst:temp1-n|Article name}} gives a template warning the user

Don't forget you can sign posts on user pages and talk pages by typing ~~~~.

Kind regards,

EvocativeIntrigue 10:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Userboxes edit

Sorry, meant to add something before I saved it- yuo can add userboxes to your userpage quite easily- have a look at this!

Regards, EvocativeIntrigue 10:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


El Paso, Texas edit

Are you from El Paso? Somnabot 23:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

El Paso edit

I was born and raised in El Paso, Texas. Apparently, I know the city very well and know it like the back of my hand. I no longer reside there.  :) How about you?

I am looking to further expand the article about El Paso. I hope to branch the article out amongst topics of neighborhoods, personality, and notable people. A valid aspect lacking in the current article is the presence of the Albert Bacon Fall 1907 mansion located at 1725 Arizona. This piece of the El Paso puzzle is only one example of what is lacking. Prominent names within the El Paso community continue to remain faceless within the pages of Wikipedia as well. Aside from the El Paso article, I wish to further expand the Ciudad Juarez article as it is brief, and overall below average in content. I write to you looking for help... If you have anything to contribute along these lines, please aid me in my endeavor. Somnabot 06:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Although Miguel Terrazas was doubtless a good man, he does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for inclusion. The question has come up many times, and being killed in action does not, in itself, meet those criteria. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Miguel Terrazas edit

While Miguel Terrazas might have been a good man, it was decided that he did not meet notability requirements and that his article constituted little more than a memorial article, which Wikipedia is not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miguel_Terrazas Jayran 16:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

As the user that originally put the article on Miguel Terrazas up for deletion, I'll explain some of the reasons why I did so. Here's a cached copy of the original article prior to deletion, in case you want to see it. <http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:vYkkeJ6cKyAJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Terrazas+Miguel+Terrazas&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us> As you can see, Miguel Terrazas didn't meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia. Almost all soldiers that have died in the Iraq invasion have received the same or even less media coverage than Miguel Terrazas because he and the others are not notable outside of their deaths. The three marines involved with the Haditha Massacre are known to the media because of the international outcry following the butchering of civilians that echoes the My Lai Massacre and other such atrocities in the past alongside the continued fallout from that atrocity.
I'm not too sure what is with the anti-Semetic comment but I'm guessing that you are referring to Nick Berg, the American contracter that was beheaded on video, right? His death (and the other similar ones) are more notable because of the international coverage they received as he and the others were civilians captured by the insurgency and were killed, rather gruesomely, on video. The nature of the target and the means that they died are different and that for better or for worse, receives more coverage. Jayran 22:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Stop edit

I'll ask you once nicely to stop with the anti-semitic claims in your messages to other editors


It is an unnecessary and incorrect characterization of how things work here and frankly it is offensive.--Isotope23 20:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

San Elizario Chapel edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of San Elizario Chapel, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.rootsweb.com/~txseghs/tour.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Response edit

Forgive me for my late reply. I have been very busy attending to my own affairs. Yes, I was born in El Paso, I still reside within the general area, and am more than happy to help you if you need anything. Let me know. Somnabot 00:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Stanley "Doc" Cummings edit

 

An editor has nominated Stanley "Doc" Cummings, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley "Doc" Cummings and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of Image:DallasStoudenmire.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:DallasStoudenmire.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

El Paso County Constable edit

I proposed deleting El Paso County Constable on the grounds that the office is not notable. None of Texas's other counties have articles about their constables. I considered putting a db-a7 speedy deletion tag on it but given the article's age and edit history that would've been a bit of a ram-rod. With a PROD the article will stay up a week so it can be improved.

If this office has done something unique that makes it notable compared to other constables, then please beef up the article. The general office of "Constable" in Texas already has an article, see Texas Constable.

If you disagree with me, you may remove the PROD, as described here.

If you agree with me, consider adding a "prod-2" tag and note that you started the article. It's a bit late to add a db-author tag or blank the article, as others have already edited it substantially. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DallasStoudenmire.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:DallasStoudenmire.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, TXLonghorn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Your recent edit to List of defunct retailers of the United States appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 04:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

Can you please add your source to Francisco "Chamuscado" Sánchez? If you ping me when it's done, I'll review it so it's indexed by Google. At the moment, with no verified information, it is in danger of being tagged for deletion. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, TXLonghorn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, TXLonghorn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco "Chamuscado" Sánchez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello TXLonghorn, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Francisco "Chamuscado" Sánchez have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply