Your submission at Articles for creation: Signal (cigarettes) (December 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 16:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, TMG13655! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 16:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Signal (cigarettes) (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 23:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Signal (cigarettes) (January 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 08:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Signal (cigarettes) (February 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
This is not an advertisement. Wikipedia does not allow for advertisement. This is a neutral point of view article on a product. All items are sourced and follow the Wiki terms. TMG13655 (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Signal (cigarettes)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Signal (cigarettes), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TMG13655

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:TMG13655 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Star Mississippi 13:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 13:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TMG13655 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We're adding a business that has been active since 2006 and all information was sourced and accurate, not promotion or advertising. TMG13655 (talk) 17:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Everything you've done so far has been in violation of WP:PROMO and likely WP:COI as well. It's not relevant that the business has been active since 2006. Please use your own website to promote these businesses. --Yamla (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The template used was sourced from many Wikipedia pages that used similar attribution and information within the tobacco industry. All information is sourced from first-rate news sources and does not contain any advertising or promotional material. Refer to Grand River Enterprises and other cigarette companies as examples. No violation of WP:PROMO or WP: COI exists. TMG13655 (talk) 17:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please read WP:OSE. Not all articles are good models for future ones. Star Mississippi 17:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Then those articles that don't meet today's standards should be deleted, as well. A rolling standard makes it difficult, when they're based on interpretations, to have a page approved. If I mislabeled the page, that was my mistake. But the article does meet the standards established by Wiki. TMG13655 (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
And perhaps someone will Multiple editors have said it does not meet the standards. GRE was created long before the AfC process. If Signal, Ohserase Manufacturing or any others meet WP:ORG, someone unconnected with them will write about them. You say you have no conflict of interest, but you seem persistent in having these subjects on Wikipedia which is quite a disconnect. If you're going to write about something else, you may be unblocked at another admin's discretion, but not to continue to write about cigarette companies Star Mississippi 18:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Your logic does not make sense, just because it was created long before the process, it's still subject to today's standards. Comparing apples to oranges. I write about these because they're relevant and applicable. Apply the rules evenly, because both articles met all guidelines and still won't be allowed. TMG13655 (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
When it was created just meant it was never "approved", it just existed, which is different to how new users create articles today. You'll see that I nominated it for deletion because it does not meet the standards. Thanks for flagging it Star Mississippi 23:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The other page that should be considered is the Seneca (cigarette) page because it was created, but never approved. TMG13655 (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TMG13655. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created  User:TMG13655 has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

User pages and User talk pages are intended only to assist collegiality among users. They are not to be used as a soapbox for writings not connected with the editorial process on Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and

  • not a free webhosting service ,
  • not a personal website,
  • not a blog
  • not a social media site

Nor are user pages intended to host articles, CV's/resumés or lengthy autobiographies. Wikipedia is not a promotional venue or a place to post ads. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia ~ subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. For article creation, Please use WP:AfC and/or request help at the TEAHOUSE. You can also seek help via IRC chat.

More information on user pages is available at THIS PAGE.


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply