TJQx83928

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 8)

Original Editors Denial

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• User:TJQx83928/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TJQx83928! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the quotes come from US Federal Government published reports, memorandums, and documents. These documents are not copyrighted per US copyright law; section 105 of the Copyright Act, which specifies that such works are not entitled to domestic copyright protection under U.S. law and are therefore in the public domain.

One document quoted is an official memorandum signed by the Secretary of Defense. The memo meets the definition "a work prepared by an officer or employee" of the federal government "as part of that person's official duties" work of the United States government, and is therefore in public domain.

The other document is a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report. This report also falls under section 105 of the Copyright Act. Further, according to the GAO website, "GAO's products and information on GAO's Web site are not protected by copyright law in the United States and may be copied and distributed in their entirety without permission from GAO." Additionally, these documents are also covered under section 105 of the Copyright Act.

Further, the quotes are appropriately cited in the entry, giving credit to the works from which the wording was derived.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 9)

Editor Response

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• User:TJQx83928/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the quotes come from US Federal Government published reports, memorandums, and documents. These documents are not copyrighted per US copyright law; section 105 of the Copyright Act, which specifies that such works are not entitled to domestic copyright protection under U.S. law and are therefore in the public domain.

One document quoted is an official memorandum signed by the Secretary of Defense. The memo meets the definition "a work prepared by an officer or employee" of the federal government "as part of that person's official duties" work of the United States government, and is therefore in public domain.

The other document is a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report. This report also falls under section 105 of the Copyright Act. Further, according to the GAO website, "GAO's products and information on GAO's Web site are not protected by copyright law in the United States and may be copied and distributed in their entirety without permission from GAO." Additionally, these documents are also covered under section 105 of the Copyright Act.

Further, the quotes are appropriately cited in the entry, giving credit to the works from which the wording was derived.

@Dan arndt and Theroadislong: The page is a work of the US Government and therefore unsuitable for being protected by copyright. So, copy/paste is not a valid reason for not accepting the article. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Cross Functional Team has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, : Do you think you can possibly find some reference from outside the us government? We really shouldhave this article, but it will be difficult without it. Surely one of the defense industry publications has commented. . Thanks! And let me know if you find something; I'll accept it. DGG ( talk ) 21:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TJQx83928

Thank you for creating Secretary of Defense-Empowered Cross-Functional Teams.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Cross Functional Team

Hello, TJQx83928. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Cross Functional Team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)