TBall84
Welcome
edit
|
Hello TBall84, thankyou for your edits to the 2008 UEFA Cup Final riots article. Please remember to include reliable sources so that we can verify the information you add. Without it, the information will have to be removed. This is especially true with an article such as this which is prone to POV and bias from both sides. We need to make sure it is as accurate as possible. If you have any questions, then please leave a note on my talkpage. Regards. Woody (talk) 19:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have reverted some of your edits to this article. Please to not remove verifiable information. Nev1 (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
editYou currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on John Reid (politician). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Please read WP:BLP. You may not repeatedly add unsourced and non-neutral language to the John Reid (politician). Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 01:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
August 2009
editThis edit to Harry Redknapp was not appropriate and has been reverted. Please do not violate WP:BLP guidelines with incorrect statements about living persons. --ClubOranjeT 00:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
NPOV warning
editPlease do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to El Hadji Diouf. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Bility (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I've completed your nomination of this article, and added some additional notes. While I don't make a recommendation, there are some strong points in favor of deletion. You may wish to visit the debate and expand your rationale. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)