User talk:T3chl0v3r/May 2009

Bubble tea!

-download | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Nev Pask

Are you serious about deleting this article? He's a billionaire, very big property developer whose daughter married a prominent figure in politics. If he's not notable, you'll have to delete half the bios on Wikipedia. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

You said the article had no citations when you proposed it for deletion[1]. As you can see by following that link, that's not true. I really do urge you to be more careful. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

The problem on that article is that you need a references section at the bottom of the page, which there wasn't. You also need multiple sources. I'm sorry for putting the speedy tag on there, however there is no need to keep reprimanding me. T3chl0v3r (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

A references section to list the references already present could easily have been added by you, which it wasn't. At the time you proposed the speedy delete, it already had multiple sources. Thank you for your apology, it is appreciated. You see, I'm not concerned about it as it relates to that article, I'm concerned you might be doing it on other articles without carefully reviewing the material. Perhaps many new articles are problematic, I'm not sure but that doesn't excuse not reading the articles, checking the sources and initiating a discussion, rather than just proposing a speedy delete. That approach is not what Wikipedia is about, and I'm glad you acknowledge it. I'll be watching the articles you propose for deletion to ensure this doesn't happen again. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 16:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

That's fine, just make sure to be civil about it. T3chl0v3r (talk) 16:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Yep, will do. Have you reviewed a few of your many proposed page deletions and most seem quite legitimate, please always ensure though that you WP:AGF, without that we don't have much. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 16:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I've requested being able to use the ACC. This is the confirmation post.

I've requested being able to use the ACC. This is the confirmation post. T3chl0v3r (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. Unfortunately I was unable to process your request. The ACC tool is a powerful program, and at the present time your account is either too new for us to determine whether you would know how to properly use the tool or that you have not attained the necessary level of trust to be granted access. Please don't take this personally and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. FunPika 19:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

What are some guidelines for eligibility and experience required? At what point should I try again? T3chl0v3r (talk) 19:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

3 months and at least 1k edits may be good. FunPika 19:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. T3chl0v3r (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:WikiCake for you!

Hello, T3chl0v3r. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Jiioo6y

Don't bother with that user. Already indef blocked as a vandalism-only account ;) MuZemike 22:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Hinjab

Hi, I don't see an attack in Hinjab. not sure its got the makings of an article but what makes you think it an attack? ϢereSpielChequers 22:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello, please see [2]. It would appear that hinjab is "A derrogitory slang given to persons from India". T3chl0v3r (talk) 22:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

OK tis toast. Though I'm thinking vandalism rather than attack. Oh and thanks for the cake! ϢereSpielChequers 23:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! Always happy to spread wikilove! T3chl0v3r (talk) 23:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

2009 Mardin Attack

Sorry about that. I wasn't sure whether it belonged there or not. I'm trying to fix it up to the best of my very limited ability. I will need the help of others to help clean up the article. I can provide the information needed for the article, but will need the help of others to clean it up into a presentable article. If it turns out as more information comes out that it does not warrant a Wikipedia article, it should be deleted. Again, it is still breaking news at the moment and there is not enough information as to whether it should be deleted or not. That is my personal opinion. Your thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesryan87 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

That makes sense to me. I'll go for that. I'll help craft the article. Let me know when you need help on my talk page! T3chl0v3r (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Nightmare

Please remove the speedy deletion notice on page A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010 Film)

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 21:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Nightmare 2010

I've added more content and more will be added, please remove deletion notice

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 21:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I have reviewed the request, and removed the speedy delete tag. T3chl0v3r (talk) 22:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I have redirected that page to A Nightmare on Elm Street (franchise)#Future for two reasons. First, I Seek to Help created a page that was not appropriately titled, namely the capitalized "Film" in the article name. Second, per WP:NFF, all future films must be in production to have articles, and the production itself must be notable. As of right now, it isn't. The only news we have is casting news, and some blips about where they plan to film. That's all. We have nothing on production, because they haven't released anything about the production of the film. A single paragraph of development information doesn't warrant a page, and that is why the correct title (as well as I Seek To Help's title) is redirected to the franchise article.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Re-Direct

If you type... A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010 film) making the 'f' in lower caps, it takes you to the Nightmare on elm street franchise page. You have to type the 'f' in upper caps for it to take you to the article on the new film, is there anyway you can make it re-direct the lower 'f' to the new film?

Thanks, I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

I have fixed this, let me know if you need any more help! T3chl0v3r (talk) 01:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Deleted

Someone deleted my page for A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010 Film), How can I re-add it?

Thanks, I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 02:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Nightmare

I'm having a dispute with someone over the A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010 film) page, please join me on the discussion page for the movie

Thank You,I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 03:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Nightmare

As you can see, I gave up, therefore ending the war

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 03:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

ok let me know if you ever need any more help. --T3chl0v3r (talk) 03:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok

I will

Thanks, I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 03:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Help

Hey I need some help because my account was hacked. It says that I edited a bunch of articles that Im not intrested. I don't know how they got my password but all of the edits where in the exact same time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffeekid (talk • contribs) 14:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey, to change your password to prevent that person from accessing your account go to Special:ChangePassword and change it when you are logged in. Let me know of you need any more help. --T3chl0v3r (talk) 18:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey thanks for replying. Im sorry to bother you but Im knew so Im still getting used to this. Ill let you know if I need help Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffeekid (talk • contribs) 19:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Nightmare

I was doing some page moving and I had a page, let's call it page 1, I needed to re-name that shared the same name as page 2 so I added a ) to it's tile so I could re-name 1 the same name as page 2

Anymore Questions? Don't Hesitate to Ask!

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 22:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

---

Also, I forgot to delete it, Thanks!

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 22:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Galenic corpus

Your quick, I was in the middle of initially making the article when you stopped by. I just wanted you to know that you are almost to quick at putting those templates on(not that the article doesn't need them), and may want to give people thirty minutes or so to clean others up. SADADS (talk) 00:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to have caused you any problems. I like to tag it to let the author of the article know what an article needs. It helps to keep the new page patrol log down. T3chl0v3r (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Alan Siegel

Hi T3chl0v3r-

Can you please review the article issues that you posted up on the page for Alan Siegel. I have since erased the majority of the original entry and just left up a starting paragraph that shouldn't pose any of the issues you sited. I would like to start the page with a clean slate so that as I go adding information I know what does/doesn't cause a problem.

Thanks!

(Sgnyc01 (talk) 19:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC))

 Done Hello, I have reviewed the request, and removed all of the tags except for the unreferenced tag. We don't publish original research, so we need sources for verification. Anything that cannot be verified using reliable, 3rd party sources will be deleted. T3chl0v3r (talk) 20:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Great! I am in the process of researching to write the bio, so thanks!

(Sgnyc01 (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC))

Feel free to post any additional questions you have here. I am happy to help. When sources are added, I will remove the unreferenced tag on your article. T3chl0v3r (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

 Done You've added a source, I've removed the tag. T3chl0v3r (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for giving me a link to the list of new pages, I've been trying to find it for a while( or is it awhile?)! Stormcloud22 (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: FileQube

FYI, Charles Edmunds seems to be affiliated with FileQube. Check out the blog post here. I'm not trying to get into a deletion battle with you over this, but thought you might be interested. Brianga (talk) 21:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

As stated on my post on your talk page, take it to prod or AFD. you can leave a single issue warning template on his talk page (try {{uw-autobiography}}. T3chl0v3r (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello, T3chl0v3r. You have new messages at Brianga's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WikiProject User Rehab

Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 05:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Signature

Hey,

I see you contested a page being speedied. You left a message to that effect on my talk page but you didn't sign it. Just a notice if you're using a script or such that that is a bug in it. Computerjoe's talk 15:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Davidson West and Nobert Streets Roundabout

Hello, I have received a deletion notice. I have taken action on it and added many more references, text, factual information as well as references to local media headlines. I hope this is all OK; I have removed the template from the page - I am somewhat inexperienced in this.

Although I however have contributed quite a bit to other Wikis in the past, I could use some help... I saw you adopt users - I read about it and I am interested. I already learnt something by looking at your posts (the "Tildes" signature) I am looking forward to bringing in some knowledge to this World. Thanks.

Charrma (talk) 01:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Crushed (singer) tagged as an attack pagw

That was not an attack page. In view of the questionable notability, it was a valid question. The way to go in this instance was just to blank the talk page as unconstructive. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 22:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:James Geddy

Hi there, sorry for my incorrect tagging. I believed that the unremarkable was the same as non-notable. Thank you for the advice and correction. Sincerely, MacMed^{talk to me!}_{what have i done?} 23:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

speedy-notice-decline

Hello. I'm concerned that the template you are using, User:T3chl0v3r/speedy-notice-decline, may be using false terminology and/or false statements. I don't understand where the 'remarkable' standard comes in - that word is not even mentioned on WP:CSD. As best I can tell, speedy deletion hinges on whether the articles indicates the importance of the subject. The 'remarkability' of the subject does not seem to be an important component of CSD A7. Brianga (talk) 14:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Are you an admin? The "not done" x mark on the thing made me thing you are. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 15:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see you are not. I'd like to offer some suggestions about this template. The {{{notdone}}} gives the impression that you are an admin who declined to perform an admin function. While any user may remove a speedy deletion tag, your contact with the person who placed it should not give the impression that you are an admin. I feel it might be a bit rough. If someone hit me with a template like that, I'd feel like I'd been slapped in the face. It could be worded more in line with--

{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}} and thank you for helping to improve Wikipedia. I have removed the speedy deletion tag on [[:{{{1}}}]] because I believe the article does assert significance, a lower standard that notability, because <<your reason here.>> Cheers, and happy editing.

I generally don't use a template on patrollers 'cause I prefer to tailor my message individually. Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 20:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I understand your concerns, I am sorry if I gave you the wrong impression. However according to the Template:NotDone documentation: This is an image-based template may be used on talk pages to show clearly that a section of discussion has not been resolved, so that each editor does not have to completely re-read the section. It is not limited to admin use. I did nothing wrong there. However, I will consider rewritting the template to use something like this image. I will also use your suggestions in my new template. I didn't mean to offend anyone. I've only been here a month, and I am trying to find my place. T3chl0v3r (talk) 20:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

I have 2009 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. T3chl0v3r (talk) 20:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Forward Wales

If you bother to click on the link, you would find out that the website does not exist any longer. Tell me what is the point of keeping it up?--Welshsocialist (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Im sorry, there is none. Feel free to take it down again. T3chl0v3r (talk) 21:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I undetrstand why you thought it might be vandalism though, it is very unusual for a political party not to have a website, I did also try to see if google could find their offical website, or at least a blog by the leader or founder, but could not find any. --Welshsocialist (talk) 21:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined on CSD Test Page

Hello T3chl0v3r and thank you for helping to improve Wikipedia by tagging pages for speedy deletion.. I have removed the speedy deletion tag on CSD Test Page, because CSD A7, despite the misleading {{db-notability}} tag, is not about notability, just indication of significance or importance, a much lower standard. Please be more careful and maybe read WP:A7M to avoid mistakes with this criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Just so you know, mistakes like this are made by new and experienced users alike and it is very common. Happy editing! T3chl0v3r (talk) 20:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC) {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Speedy deletion declined on test

Hello T3chl0v3r and thank you for helping to improve Wikipedia by tagging pages for speedy deletion. I have removed the speedy deletion tag on test, because CSD A7, despite the misleading {{db-notability}} tag, is not about notability, just indication of significance or importance, a much lower standard. Please be more careful and maybe read WP:A7M to avoid mistakes with this criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Just so you know, mistakes like this are made by new and experienced users alike and it is very common. Happy editing! T3chl0v3r (talk) 20:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC) {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

removed as a courtesy to our viewers

Do you have a source for this? Otherwise, it needed to be removed immediatly. Drew Smith What I've done 22:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC) {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Talkback

Hello, T3chl0v3r. You have new messages at Promethean's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC) {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Talkback

Hello, T3chl0v3r. You have new messages at Promethean's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 22:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC) {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Why did you remove my edit?

Why did you remove my edit on the page Bilingual pun? ***** taste good really sounds similar with Kaksteist guud, which means Twelve months in Estonian! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.156.168.23 (talk) 22:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

See WP:NOR T3chl0v3r (talk) 01:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

In regard to Boston Neurotalks page.

In regard to Boston Neurotalks page. Please explain proper process to keep page. The service exists, it has existed for years, it has hundreds of users. Many of its users are nobel laureates...what more do you want? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aseitz (talk • contribs)

The process? Indicate it's notability, and don't create article's about yourself or things you might have a Conflict of Interest with. T3chl0v3r (talk) 22:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

I did not create this page and it was not my idea for the page to be added. I am just writing to support the page. aseitz (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Anyway, you should NEVER remove AFD templates until the AFD is closed by an established editor or an admin. You could remove the speedy tag, but we would like to know why you believe it satisfies the significance requirement. T3chl0v3r (talk) 22:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Ergh Huggle...

That was supposed to go on the vandals page... Drew Smith What I've done 22:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Lol. Well, let's just censor that, shall we? T3chl0v3r (talk) 22:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but it wasn't an attempt at humor. He re-added it with an edit summary along the lines of "this is true" or something like that... I was trying to ask him if he had a source, but huggle saw you were the last person to edit his talk page, so it locked onto your name. So when I clicked "message this user" it sent it to you instead of him...Drew Smith What I've done 23:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

As an avid huggle user with rollback permision, I know the pains of huggle. However please link to diffs, not put the bad content in the header. It helps all of our eyes. Regards, T3chl0v3r (talk) 23:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I guess that makes sense for occasions like that.Drew Smith What I've done 23:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

ACC Notice - Request 30054

Hi, I was recently going over recent request closures when I noticed that you made a mistake on this request. In this case the appropriate action would have been to create the account and I have since done this for you. Please read the ACC user guide and/or be more careful when handling future requests as users who make frequent errors may have their ACC access removed at the discretion of a ACC admin. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me on my talkpage or your favorite ACC admin. Cheers   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

64.126.48.127

I noticed your message on User:64.126.48.127's talk page. Can something be done about the repeated edits to Villains in A Series of Unfortunate Events? — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 02:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I've reported him to the administrators. They will probably put a block on him. T3chl0v3r (talk) 02:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Turns out the edits are not vandalism. T3chl0v3r (talk) 02:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

• License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
• News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
• WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I believe you erroneously reverted my edit

You deleted my inclusion of the quote "They use Brasky's foreskin as a tarp when it rains at Yankee Stadium." from the Bill Brasky page, on the grounds that it was unconstructive. I could find no such standard for 'unconstructivity', possibly because 'unconstructive' is not a word. Further, careful analysis of the "Bar" skit, aired on 12 December 1998, (available for your verification here: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/bill-brasky-stock-broker/2305843009264487852/?icid=VIDURVENT01) contains this quote, beginning at 4:56, by John Goodman. I would appreciate if you reverted your revert, or explained why it did not meet your standard and quotes such as "His poop is considered currency in Argentina." are OK by you. I, in turn, apologize for not knowing all the rules that needed to be invoked when trying to help append 11 year old TV skits on Wikipedia. Perhaps your talents could be put to use someplace a little less 'unconstructive'? Much Obliged, 75.75.100.149 (talk) 11:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry that I offended you by reverting that edit. For your information, that is an official Wikipedia policy and template with the word unconstructive, meaning the opposite of constructive. Things containing obscene quotes or words are generally reverted immediately, especially coming from an IP. YOU should remain WP:CIVIL when addressing people, such as in the above post. Feel free to edit the page and add it again, and see how quickly someone else reverts it. When you add obscene things, you need references. T3chl0v3r (talk) 16:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

No, no, you didn't offend me. And I did retort with more piss and vinegar than the situation called for; for that, I sincerely apologize. Honestly, however, it's little junk like this that keeps me from becoming a Wikipedian. I try to add something I think is funny, and it's called obscene. (Foreskin? Half of humans have, or had, it, and I'm pretty sure that it's not an obscene word, at least not any more obscene than breastfeeding John Madden.) Heh, maybe you're a Yankee's fan, I don't know. Anyway, I suppose I'll have to stick to reading, not editing. This debate has already taken up too much time, and I honestly don't care that much whether or not that particular quip is included. I'll stick to reading. Cheers, 75.75.100.149 (talk) 22:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the Wikiproject Barnstar! Unfortunately, I came to that project late, and it was already a dormant project. I attmepted to revitalise it, with only minimal success. The project is still watchlisted, so if anyone ever pops up and takes an interest, I'll be there to guide them along.Drew Smith What I've done 23:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

• From the editor: Browsing the archives
• Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
• Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
• News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC) {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}