T-Esperantist93
Welcome
edit
|
Hello, I'm Finngall. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Republic of Molossia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Finngall talk 02:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Discussion invite
editHello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Lincoln (NYC station)
editHello T-Esperantist93,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lincoln (NYC station) for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
The article NS 999 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No references, and so no evidence of notability. Inadequate information to be encyclopedic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)