Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Tit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lcarscad 22:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Long term abuse (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

MARTIN BOT edit

 

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as MARTIN BOT, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Pan Dan 21:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

-- zzuuzz(talk) 21:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Knights of the KKK edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Knights of the KKK, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


May 2007 edit

 

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jason Acuña, you will be blocked from editing. Ocatecir Talk 21:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Fatty.gif edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Fatty.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Weeman.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Weeman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:10s.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:10s.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:10s.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:10s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Me_and_adam.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Me_and_adam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply