Speedy deletion nomination of Acrotec Group

edit

Hello Swissfrance,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Acrotec Group for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 13:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your help desk question

edit

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Acrotec Group

edit
 

The article Acrotec Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. Sources present in the article are either routine or trivial mentions, not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Swissfrance with no other contributions outside this topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply