Svarshavsky

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergei Varshavsky (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Sergei Varshavsky.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Svarshavsky, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Sergei Varshavsky (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Sergei Varshavsky.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hewhoamareismyself 10:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Sergei Varshavsky article

This is my response to Chris Troutman regarding the comment:

@Svarshavsky: The latest comments are the ones you should be most concerned about. Too many of your sources are from the subject himself, therefore not independent. Please read WP:RS and WP:42. On another point, I recommend removing all Russian words from the text of the article as it's both unnecessary and confusing. The sources can remain in Russian but I'm not so certain we need Cyrillic translations of so much Latin text. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Chris, Sorry, I did not find a better way how to respond to your comment. All reviewers say that "Too many of your sources are from the subject himself, therefore not independent." The problem is that a substantial part of my article is about a writer Sergei Varshavsky, who died in 1980. Writers write themselves, hence most of references direct to what they write. In my particular case, all writings of Sergei Varshavsky were published by publishers, and not by the writer himself, so I believe they are independent. Like if one writes an article about Leo Tolstoy, there will be a reference on Anna Karenina, right? Same here. In my article I also cited publications about Sergei Varshavsky books. When we move to collecting section of my article, all references are not from the subject himself. As a result, I am not sure what I can do to improve references. Sergei Varshavsky wrote 4 books about the one of the five greatest art collections in the world, and I believe he deserves an article in Wikipedia. The topic of protecting and preserving the art during wars (and especially, WW2) is very important. Tons of books have been written about that, but Sergei Varshavsky's "The Ordeal of the Hermitage" is the only credible source. Look at Harrison_Salisbury who cited the Varshavsky book literally. If we speak about Cyrillic translation, I have to mention that they are originals, and the English is a translation. Thus, if somebody wants to find the source, he/she will need the original Russian title. Otherwise the reference makes little sense. But if you insist, I can remove the original titles. Please let me know if this helps. Best regards, Sergei

Your submission at AfC Sergei Varshavsky was accepted

Sergei Varshavsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Maurice Joly page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boetius Epo has been accepted

Boetius Epo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Georges Kugelmann moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Georges Kugelmann, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 01:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Lord. I will add the sources right now and resubmit. Cheers, Sergei

Your thread has been archived

Hi Svarshavsky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Cannot find the page I created yesterday, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georges Kugelmann has been accepted

Georges Kugelmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)