Surajkoll
November 2019 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here Hello MER-C, First of all i can't understand why this article about this lady is considered as for advertising or promotion. But since that question raised and i need to explain what made to start my Wikipedia journey and why this is first article. For over a long time now i have been benefited firm Wikipedia, right from my collage days as the contributions explain the articles from very basic level. It has been in my mind to become one of the contributor as i love to research and write articles. But due to various reasons and time factor i could not start until this year. and when i thought to publish my first article i went through many articles in Wikipedia and felt writing a page or article about some famous person is easy because it is easy to research about them and you can be factually correct as it is with in the boundary of the person. So, when i went through many known personalities, good thing i found is all of them already created and preserved. So, as i am from Kuwait i started to search about local personalities thinking there is less chance for those articles to be written on them. But still few names already there. so when i am researching i also came across the rules and norms about referencing and writing an article. so, then i decided to write about this lady who is famous here and got featured for her work. This is completely not for advertising and you can also see the references and i went through all her articles and did search as well. So, my kind request is i am planing to write at least 5 articles next year and this is my first article. please tell what are the reasons this seems to be appearing as advertising and what changes i need to make and follow in near feature to avoid my articles to appear like this. if writing on biographies will project like promotion, please advise what is the best category to pick. thank you ~~~~}}. MER-C 20:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Surajkoll (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello MER-C, First of all i can't understand why this article about this lady is considered as for advertising or promotion. But since that question raised and i need to explain what made to start my Wikipedia journey and why this is first article. For over a long time now i have been benefited firm Wikipedia, right from my collage days as the contributions explain the articles from very basic level. It has been in my mind to become one of the contributor as i love to research and write articles. But due to various reasons and time factor i could not start until this year. and when i thought to publish my first article i went through many articles in Wikipedia and felt writing a page or article about some famous person is easy because it is easy to research about them and you can be factually correct as it is with in the boundary of the person. So, when i went through many known personalities, good thing i found is all of them already created and preserved. So, as i am from Kuwait i started to search about local personalities thinking there is less chance for those articles to be written on them. But still few names already there. so when i am researching i also came across the rules and norms about referencing and writing an article. so, then i decided to write about this lady who is famous here and got featured for her work. This is completely not for advertising and you can also see the references and i went through all her articles and did search as well. So, my kind request is i am planing to write at least 5 articles next year and this is my first article. please tell what are the reasons this seems to be appearing as advertising and what changes i need to make and follow in near feature to avoid my articles to appear like this. if writing on biographies will project like promotion, please advise what is the best category to pick. thank you
Decline reason:
You claim to have taken File:Noor-Bin-Eidan.jpg yourself. That's unlikely, if there's no conflict of interest. But of course, there is. Off-wiki evidence shows you have a direct conflict of interest regarding Done Interior. Shame on you for trying to mislead us. This is a clear and blatant violation of WP:UPE and you've clearly demonstrated we can't trust you. Yamla (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|Hello MER-C, I went through the reasons and other articles and your talk page as well. I got it the action is taken by you as my user page is not created properly and i don't have information on my user page. In that case please unblock me and i will start from editing the user page. Thank you }}
Surajkoll (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello Yamla, Why that much harsh language, I just claimed its copy right is ine as in my sandbox article they deleted other picture and this is the only option where i ca upload picture in that article. And you can clearly see i explained in my previous reply that i chose this article at my convince. as this will be easy for me but its not paid article. In This case you can delete the article and i will not write about this article. I will start on something else. for that is not necessary to accuse me of misleading and breaking trust. those are big words, Can you please check the article and see if i wrote any biased information and i gave reference for everything after research. Anyways if the article is felt promotional. you can highlight the points and i will not repeat them in my coming articles. As this is the first article i am trying to learn here. And please kindly not its not paid or promoted article. Please consider and as an seniors please try to guide, And if it is repeated then you can take a call. but not calling names. Please understand. Thank you
Decline reason:
I had no trouble finding the connection between you and Done Interior. Being unaware of Wikipedia's rules regarding a conflict of interest is one thing; lying about not having a conflict of interest is something else. We cannot trust you. Huon (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So, you are now claiming that you deliberately lied on the copyright of the image you uploaded, placing the entire project in jeopardy? And despite your continued claims, you have a clear conflict of interest. Any admin is free to determine this for themselves or to email me for more information. Regardless, I strongly oppose unblocking this editor. --Yamla (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Surajkoll (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear, I am not claiming i have deliberately done, I am trying to explain i uploaded images through different available options and i couldn't upload and when i try to give proper reference from magazine articles or websites, they have been deleted. I agree it was my mistake for not properly going through the available material or guidelines. now i can understand the copyright and i will figure it out and will see it is not repeated in future articles. and i appeal to you to kindly see that if you feel its COI and i contradicted the guidelines, which i feel i followed. you can mention that and delete that article and allow other edits. i will not repeat these edits resulting on breaking the rules. this is an genuine mistake from my side and i will take care of this. Kindly consider this. Thank you
Decline reason:
At this point your only possible(and narrow) pathway back would be the standard offer as it is difficult to trust what you state. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.