December 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wonder Woman 1984 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker 09:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Look why would you want to spoil the whole thing to the audience. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 09:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don't really understand what you mean, so could you please tell me that? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker 09:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wonder Woman 1984. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker 09:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's not vandalism I am just preventing spoilers. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 09:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

What I meant is why do you want to spoil the whole movie right now you can add the plot later on but not now a lot of people have not watch the movie yet. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 09:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

You did remove content without any good explanation, that's vandalism. Please don't do that unless you've got a good reason. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker 09:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

My reason was because a lot of people haven't watch the movie yet. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps why not you asked wikipedia to remove the plot when people haven't even watch the movie yet. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 09:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

That does not explain the content removal. To repeat myself: Do not remove content of pages unless you've got a very good reason to do that. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker 09:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well it's ok I will appeal to wikipedia to delete the plot. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 09:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wdym Superman Prime One Million (talk) 10:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Superman Prime One Million, acording to Wikipedia:Spoiler, 'it is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot'. --SkiMaskA (talk) 11:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Figging has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Zhang Weili - vandalism edit

  Hello, I'm Diana056. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zhang Weili have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Diana056 (talk) 14:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

UFC edit

Elbows to head from crucifix is taken directly from the UFC stats page. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 16:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


Pls note that the fight method is as per Sherdog based on Wikipedia MMA guideline. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Pls also note that on the event / fighter pages we use vertical fight table format for the fight record. Pls do not change it. Cassiopeia talk 00:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sherdog? You are a sherdog here. You know that description is taken directly from UFC stats websites no wonder no one uses Wikipedia. No one cares about you guys. Superman Prime One Million (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Valentina Shevchenko. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 00:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Priscila Cachoeira. Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 14:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Germaine de Randamie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cassiopeia talk 19:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Priscila Cachoeira, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cassiopeia talk 19:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rose Namajunas. Cassiopeia talk 19:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zhang Weili, you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 13:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rose Namajunas. Cassiopeia talk 13:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dustin Poirier, you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply