Superdupersmartdude

February 2015

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Gin and Juice. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 02:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Mary Celeste and Bermuda triangle myths

While the Bermuda triangle has occasionally been invoked as a possible factor in the Mary Celeste mystery, this has normally been down to geographical ignorance. The area of the Atlantic known as the Bermuda triangle is nowhere near where Mary Celeste was abandoned. A passing mention in the main text, if only to highlight the fallacy, may be worthwhile, but not in the lead. Brianboulton (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bernard Madoff, you may be blocked from editing. PhantomTech (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Feminism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism and trolling. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Floquenbeam (talk) 22:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

To head off the inevitable "I'm not a sock, I'm just really superdupersmart and have read up on previous ArbCom cases" defense: That is not true, we are not idiots. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC)