Sunny5566
December 2018 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Edmonds station (Washington), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SounderBruce 09:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Recent edit to Tourism in India edit
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Tourism in India article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Paranormal. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 11:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Paid editing edit
Hello Sunny5566. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sunny5566. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sunny5566|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Peacock (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Athaenara and Peacock, I totally understand and have gone through the policy of wikipedia. I am not related to Valuefy or Zim Laboratories Limited from anywhere. Recently I came to know the updates on them from news and awards, So I have written this articles. The founder's father of Zim laboratories was already having the wikipedia page, so I wrote the article. I believe we should have page for Zim Laboratories because it is a public listed company and people buy shares of this company. We shoould have provide enough information about it, So that peopke should invest their money on the right asset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunny5566 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Conflict of interest edit
Hello, Sunny5566. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in Zim laboratories limited, Valuefy, or other pages, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 00:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Athaenara and Peacock, I totally understand and have gone through the policy of wikipedia. I am not related to Valuefy or Zim Laboratories Limited from anywhere. Recently I came to know the updates on them from news and awards, So I have written this articles. The founder's father of Zim laboratories was already having the wikipedia page, so I wrote the article. I believe we should have page for Zim Laboratories because it is a public listed company and people buy shares of this company. We shoould have provide enough information about it, So that peopke should invest their money on the right asset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunny5566 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Blocked edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.