Potential conflict of interest

edit

I notice that references you are adding have a name connection to your username. The message below may therefore be of relevance. Deli nk (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Sullivanlab. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit
Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

  1. Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
  2. We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
  3. Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
  4. The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
  5. We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
  6. More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
  7. Citation details are important:
    • Be sure cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
    • Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
    • Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
    • Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
  8. We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
  9. Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!\
  10. Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
  11. Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Did you read any of the above? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

You need to format properly. Please read WP:MEDHOW. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

You need to take time to learn how to edit Wikipedia before you continue making changes... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removal all the references

edit

Why did you do this at ADHD? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Causes of ADHD (January 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sullivanlab! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

The submission at Draft:Causes of ADHD reads as if it has been copied from a book. The appearance of having been copied from a book is increased by the strange nature of the references, which are numbers, that may be either numbered footnotes or page numbers from the book. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. You are being cautioned that any future evidence of copyright violation may result in a block.

If you have any questions about copyright policy, you may ask at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Sullivanlab. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Sullivanlab! You created a thread called Editing page contact and adding references at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply