Sujan5232

April 2024

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I'm Annh07. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Strategic Consortium of Intelligence Professionals moved to draftspace

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for your contributions to Strategic Consortium of Intelligence Professionals. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Crunchbase

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed that you added Crunchbase in the References section of Draft:Strategic Consortium of Intelligence Professionals. Please note that Crunchbase is deprecated as a source; see WP:CRUNCHBASE for details. Schazjmd (talk) 14:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strategic Consortium of Intelligence Professionals (July 15)

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strategic Consortium of Intelligence Professionals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Sujan5232! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic