Sublimeport

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Imran Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jpeeling (talk) 18:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

You delete 42k of information and you wonder why I reverted your edits, I'm sorry I don't understand your problem. Your article on Imran Khan (Punjabi Singer) has been deleted so it's clear you were replacing legit information with a nobody, that's why I reverted your edit and it's constitutes vandalism in my book. --Jpeeling (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

It was not vandalism but an honest mistake. I had several tabs open and i was copying from the Imran Khan cricketer article to a new article and i messed up. If you had not come in like 30 seconds after my mistake i would have reverted my mistaken edit myself. To say that it was vandalism is slander and ignorance. I have like thousands of other selfless good users reverted deliberate vandalism or corrected spelling and grammar mistakes. You are a nobody. You need to start cutting some slack to new people who want to contribute value to wikipedia.

Speedy deletion of Imran Khan (Punjabi Singer)

A tag has been placed on Imran Khan (Punjabi Singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 18:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)