Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Beckham law have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on the administrator's talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Using links to your business as WP:RS independent reliable sources is considered spam and/or advertising and is not permitted.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hello Kudpung กุดผึ้ง, the article explicitly says "This article needs attention from an expert in Taxation", which we are. I can add more sources if you want us to reflect consensus on this matter, although there isn't a big literature regarding this topic, which is actually relevant. We intend to make not only one, but several contributions to Wikipedia.
Please see WP:ROLE. However accurate and neutral the edits might be which you intend to make, this is unfortunately not the way Wikipedia works in order to preserve total neutrality. You may not under any circumstances edit as a group or representing a group of people; you may not use primary sources, and the use of corporate publicity material is absolutely forbidden. See WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:OR. Wikipedia may claim to be The encyclopedeia anyone can edit, but we have policies and guidelines which must be followed.
Please also familiarise yourself with talk page procedures and sign your posts in the prescribed manner. See: WP:SIG. I hope however that you decide to continue contributing to our project as a private individual. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested.Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง What exactly do you mean by ″you may not use primary sources″ and ″corporate publicity material″. Arent edits supposed to be backed by trustworthy sources. The very same article has links from another law firm with the same authority as mine. I can just as well edit as myself, or several of us as individual authors if editing as a group is not allowed. You havent answered my question about the entry "This article needs attention from an expert in Taxation". I think you could be really a bit more helpful, if you are claiming to be protecting Wikipedias interests and want to encourage people to participate Suarez Santiago (talk) 11:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Here it is again: Using links to your business as WP:RS independent reliable sources is considered spam and/or advertising and is not permitted.
I have helped - I have provided links to all the information you need to avoid coming in conflict with our rules and policies. And here's another one: WP:PSTS. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Kudpung กุดผึ้งAnd you still haven't answered any of my questions, which makes me doubt that you are acting free of interest Suarez Santiago (talk) 18:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
