Stuipd post

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stuipd post (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stuipd post and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Stuipd post! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stuipd post

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Stuipd post, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Acroterion (talk) 03:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stuipd post (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Stuipd post (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a good reason to unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stuipd post (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I own stuipd post, so this a subject I know a lot about. I'm 15 and new to Wikipedia i admit i initially used Wikipedia to try to promote my site because i used a 3rd party domain name and had really low SEO i'm really sorry but in no way was it malicious and i really was trying to create a story to make people happy i think it's unfair you can pay Wikipedia writers to write about your company but you can't write about it yourself i was not trying to mislead users that's why i used the company name as my user name. And my story fit within my company's industry (comedy/satire) i didn't know how to use references on my first article but i did try to explain and it was obvious that it was meant for entertainment purposes only. Once again I'm sorry i've learned how to use auto and basic references and would like to try to write an article about (stuipd post) but this time because i want people to learn from it and because i'm really passionate about the website and company i worked so hard to make. (please reconsider and Thank you) Stuipd post (talk) 11:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As per below. See WP:NOT. Yamla (talk) 12:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think you fundamentally misunderstand Wikipedia's purpose and editing requirements. Acroterion (talk) 12:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stuipd post (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've learned a lot about Wikipedia guidelines through this embarrassing experience and i admit that i was stupid to try to request publication without former experience and that my first article lacked much more than references and structure. But i did actually attempt to write an article that i thought was going to contribute to Wikipedia, and i believe the initial declination and deletion of draft:stuipd post was rash and presumptuous not taking into account the intention of the article and making entirely false claims such as "It is primarily designed to threaten, disparage or attack its subject." "It is a biography of a living person that is unreferenced and entirely negative in tone." "It is a page that is purely vandalistic in nature." I also believe that the Wikipedia editors acted rashly as well and did not stop to reconsider or inspect the previous claims before blocking my account.Stuipd post (talk) 17:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have just looked at your draft and it is a hoax article. You will not be unblocked to write about this subject. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.