Stormynight91

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Unbeatables III, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Unbeatables III was changed by Stormynight91 (c) (t) deleting 19349 characters on 2007-10-11T03:20:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 03:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wu Cheng Yi. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Carbon Monoxide 02:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Violation of three-revert rule on Honour and Passion

Hello, on 10 October you were involved in a revert war on the article Honour and Passion. Edit warring is considered harmful, no matter whether you are on the "right" or "wrong" side of a dispute, and the three-revert rule states that editors who revert a page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours, except in certain special circumstances, are likely to be blocked from editing. Since you may not have been aware of the rule on 10 October, your account has not been blocked, but please be aware in the future that violations of the three-revert rule will result in a block; please also be aware that no editor is entitled to three reverts per day, and edit warring below the threshhold of the three-revert rule may result in a block. --Akhilleus (talk) 23:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I Need Your Help

I have personally verified that the storylines that ColourWolf et al are inserting is not correct. I don't live in Singapore, but I have seen the show (Honour and Passion) and I know it is a lie. I am trying to get them banned, but I need some solid information that these are indeed fake. Can you help me? You can make it happen! Arbiteroftruth 03:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)