July 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Argus (Brighton), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you - I'll find a citation. StockportRedPen (talk) 09:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reach plc, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Birmingham Post
added a link pointing to Peter Saunders
Coventry Telegraph
added a link pointing to Keith Perry
The Yorkshire Post
added a link pointing to A Woman of Substance
Yorkshire Evening Post
added a link pointing to A Woman of Substance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Craddock (July 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, StockportRedPen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Jasper Rees has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jasper Rees. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 17:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasper Rees (July 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Birmingham Post
added a link pointing to Peter Saunders
Coventry Telegraph
added a link pointing to Keith Perry

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jasper Rees for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasper Rees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasper Rees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jeremy Craddock moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Jeremy Craddock 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Not notable. Now part of SPI investigation. Moving to draft space as Draft:Jeremy Craddock already exists. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 02:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:JamBalloon per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BlackArrowsmith. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply