Stochastikon-bernoulli
Too many capital letters edit
Please: You're using FAR too many capital letters in article titles and section headings. See WP:MOS. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Possible conflict of interest ? edit
You appear to have created at lest 10 new articles recently, most of which have few or no sources outside of the work of Prof. Elart von Collani, and all of which have links to Prof. Collani's company Stochastikon. The similarity of your user name and the company's name suggests you have some connection with the company or with Prof. Collani. Is this correct ?
There is obvious cause for concern here that you may be using these Wikipedia articles to promote Prof. Collani, his books and his company. I strongly suggest you read and take note of Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest. I have started a discussion about your articles at the WikiProject Mathematics talk page. Gandalf61 (talk) 08:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Bernoulli stochastics for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernoulli stochastics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernoulli stochastics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Stochastic thinking for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stochastic thinking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stochastic thinking until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Variability function for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Variability function is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Variability function until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Random structure function for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Random structure function is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Random structure function until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Bernoulli space for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernoulli space is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernoulli space until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Stochastic prediction procedure for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stochastic prediction procedure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stochastic prediction procedure until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:59, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Quantification of randomness for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quantification of randomness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantification of randomness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 18:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Stochastic measurement procedure for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stochastic measurement procedure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stochastic measurement procedure until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 18:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)