Welcome!

Hello, Steven J, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributionz. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 09:13, 6 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

The dissapearance of Birmingham edit

Sorry about those! I'm reading it direct from the maps, and I'm missing the big cities because their names aren't poking out so well underneath all those roads!

List of conurbations in the United Kingdom edit

Do you think it would be sensible to try to identify sub-conurbations of the London commuter belt? Southend/Thurrock and maybe Farnham/Aldershot/Camberley/Bracknell/Reading. And thinking about listing the entire coast between Seaford and Selsey (or maybe just Bognor).

I'm sorry about my harsh words on Talk:List of English cities by population. I just found it a particularly bizarre list, and it had no warning that people shouldn't take the values too literally. Perhaps you can come up with some wording on the page to do this that would be more acceptable to you. Morwen - Talk 12:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

The Sheffield urban area figure has been seperated into sheffield plus some of its suburbs (namely Beighton, Chapeltown and Mosborough) so the figure is a aggregate of these figures. josh 17:43, 27 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
Beighton, Chapeltown and Mosborough aren't suburbs of Sheffield but Sheffield itself. Stocksbridge is in the metropolitan borough of Sheffield but not in Sheffield. The population living in Sheffield's city district is 516100 and not 439866 as you've put it. You must be mistaking Sheffield's conurbation figures which include Dronfield, Chesterfield and Rovvrem and the district's population figures. These figures are confirmed on the Sheffield city council website. Captain scarlet 09:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
To continue on the topic of your erronous data you've once again decided to publish Sheffield City Council which knows more than you do
Thankfully other articles on Wikipedia do take in consideration correct figures and the other list of towns, cities and boroughs of England is correct. I'll be damned if the city of Leeds is larger than Sheffield, it never has been and isn't as it is. Captain scarlet 23:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Wolverhampton Princes Square.JPG edit

 
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wolverhampton Princes Square.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Admrboltz 00:11, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:Wolverhampton Princes Square.JPG edit

File:Wolverhampton Princes Square.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Wolverhampton Princes Square.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Wolverhampton Princes Square.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Wolverhampton RR St Patricks.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Wolverhampton RR St Patricks.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of localities in England by population for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of localities in England by population, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of localities in England by population until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply