Meet Cute (company) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Meet Cute (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 00:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Meet Cute (company) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Meet Cute (company), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
{{subst:COI-stern}}Deb (talk) 11:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Meet Cute (company) edit

Hello Stephanienashed1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meet Cute (company) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Arthistorian1977!
Thanks for your message back. This is a company I follow and they have been gaining traction in Hollywood seen in several articles in Deadline, Forbes, People, etc. as well as through their collaborations with Hollywood talent. Because of this, I thought it would be appropriate to create a page about this company. Is it not appropriate to have a page for a production company?
Appreciate your feedback on this piece! Stephanienashed1 (talk) 22:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

I advise you read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view again before trying to create articles. Deb (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Deb,
I appreciate your response, might you be able to help me understand which contributions are promotional? I thought they were all factual as I used credible news sources, but happy to revisit those that are not! Thanks for your help! Stephanienashed1 (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply