February 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Acroterion (talk) 04:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have provided detailed explanations. Stellarburst (talk) 04:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Discuss your changes on the article talkpage before making wholesale removals. This edit summary "asexuality as a fully form sexual orientation that is the jack off sexual orientation and does not help asexuals" is incomprehensible. Acroterion (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
This. You need consensus from the community before removing mass amounts of information. –NorthwestPassage talk 04:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

My auto-correct got me on that one but the others were perfectly fine. I read the David Bowie article 3 times. There is no reason for him to be included. He only mentions others referring to him as asexual and that he does not. This is a gross mistreating if him, his marriage to Iman, and asexuals. Stellarburst (talk) 04:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Seek consensus on the talkpage, don't use edit summaries for extensive explanations, they need to be brief and make sense. Long explanations belong on the talkpage in advance of major edits for others to review. Acroterion (talk) 04:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The articles from Barnard College are not about asexuality at all and serve to falsely beef up the article. I have read it in its entirety. The only mention of asexuality is the reference to the availability of the Asexual Manifesto. That's not a good source. The Asexual Manifesto never once makes mention of a lack of sexual attraction. Only of abstaining from sex to further feminist causes. This is not about asexuality but about feminist activism. Stellarburst (talk) 04:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Stellarburst (talk) 04:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply