Stas`

This is Stas`'s talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro:Atria (November 2)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ritchie333 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Prose like "Pro:Atria provides commercial on-premise software products that enable enterprise users and IT teams to secure and automate file transfers" doesn't really mean anything. Just say what the product is and what the man in the street would want to read about it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pro:Atria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Stas`, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro:Atria (December 9)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Weighing the current information and sources, it shows this is far too minimal on significant news outside of local announcements and notices and the general public relations surrounding them, and it unfortunately cannot support accepting this as an unquestionably notable article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pro:Atria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Programs without article

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

By now you have added your program to three different articles about FTP. All three state that the program must have its own Wikipedia article. As it does not have a Wikipedia article, I have reverted your addition. Beside that, I like to warn you about the use of a declined draft as an article. It is clearly not an article, so it should not be used. The Banner talk 19:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ProAtria

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I have filed a case at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Draft:Pro:Atria to determine if I was acting correct or acting overly harsh. You can comment there. The Banner talk 16:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can you now accept it? The Banner talk 18:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro:Atria (February 1)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pro:Atria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pro:Atria, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 02:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Pro:Atria

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Draft:Pro:Atria, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pro:Atria and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Pro:Atria during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 10:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic