Starktoncollosal

Welcome!

Hi Starktoncollosal! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! jlwoodwa (talk) 20:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

De' Anyers family moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to De' Anyers family. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Peter Daniell, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:DRAFTNOLINK. Renewal6 (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Peter Daniell. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance. Is there a way based on the manual of style to have some link to it or do you have to wait until the draft is in the article space ? thanks Starktoncollosal (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi there. Yes, you have to wait till the draft is reviewed and moved to article/main space before linking can happen. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of De'Anyers family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article De'Anyers family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De'Anyers family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Since you asked for advice: I will admit this isn't my strongest point in history, but I'll look and see if I find something. In the meantime, the suggestions you got at the AfD are good ones; find some sources that discuss the subject in depth, then add them into the article and point them out in the discussion. If you have any issues with formatting references let me know, even if you have good sources it can be a gigantic pain to insert them. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

thank you, I thought that references 1-6, 11,13 and 14 were the more in depth ones (particularly the actual biography on the family) .. and then several of the others are actually primary sources (witten at the time) from archives. I think and maybe you could let me know your thoughts on this , that it may be a case of wording in the article itself which makes it sound 'tangenital' and slighlty disconnnected.

I think in text addressing of the sources were in it at an early point but may have been removed :/ vauge memory of someone doing it. Starktoncollosal (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)