User talk:StarScream1007/Archive1

Re: Thanks!

Oh, I didn't protect it. I just added {{sprotected}} to it. But you're welcome nevertheless.  Denelson83  05:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

BTW, you can thank User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me for the block. ;)  Denelson83  05:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Eerie, Indiana

Thanks for helping me clean that up! Looks less painful now! -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 06:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:NSiderSS.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NSiderSS.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

On Dark Samus

I see your point, and I'm sorry if I was adding a bunch of unnecessary bulk; as you said, I am fairly new here. Just one thing: in the section about DS using portals, you said "riffs." It's "rifts." Not to nag, just wanted to let you know.

Thanks for the help.

--Mr. Ifafudafi

Why?

I'm just wondering, why did you revert my recent edits to slipknot (band)? Wildnox 04:09, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

It's no problem really, the funny part is if you look, you reverted back to his edit. I was worried that my edits might of been mistaken for vandalism, as the majority of edits involving genre on slipknot (band) are vandalism. I assure you though, mine are not, a little bold maybe but bold is good :) .Wildnox 04:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Rap

I see you've relinked your user page to Rap, which is a Wikipedia:disambiguation page. Unless you really intended on linking to a dab page, I suggest you link to either Rapping or Hip hop music. Dreadlocke ☥ 06:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Chad Johnson

You should take it to the talk page before deleting 90% of an article as "Trivial Cruft". I disagree with your assessment and have the right mind to revert your changes. I'll give you a chance to justify your action on the talk page before I do so. VegaDark 01:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Camp Hyrule

Why delete the part about The Lost Woods acting as a hub for trivia rounds? Discussion of Zelda games rarely, if ever, occurs in The Lost Woods. L.W. serves two real purposes: acting as the site for TSA's Zelda-themed trivia, and acting as a place where users hold their own, independent trivia rounds. --PsychoYoshi 01:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

"Discussion" is a pretty foggy term for "trivia". It could mean absolutely anything under the sun about the Zelda series, even though such talk ouside of trivia rarely occurs. In addition, while trivia could indeed be held in the other chats, and has been on a sporadic basis, upstart hosts have been regularly having their rounds in the Lost Woods on regular intervals for several years. --PsychoYoshi 17:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Images

Thanks for largely maintaining the integrity of this page. I do have one question, though about the addition of images. How do you go about getting the copyright on some of these images you have put up? I am asking you because you have placed images before. And looking through wikipedia's intructions, I can only surmise they are printing the instructions in Greek.

--maddawg1967--

Images- reply

I have used {{promotional}} and {{fanpage}}, and also included a link to where I found the image. But sometimes the images get deleted anyway. -- maddawg1967--

Chicago Bears images

None of the images used in the Chicago Bears website are promotional. Most are strongly copyrighted by Getty Images, Associatted Press and others and they can't be used in wikipedia. It's better off to try to take an image of the Bears players yourself if possible and release it under an free licence. Thanks 216.189.165.232 03:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Ahem

In case your wondering I wasn't spamming so obivously you can't see the great things im doing to this encyclopedia so either way you can't make my decisions about something so have fun watching me make wikipedia the best ROFL.You think ill act like a normal human?NO CHANCE IN HELL. Rofl no reply?I can only assume you got pwned by seeing the truth by my topic in this discussion.

Thanks

My bad. thanks for helping me on that one. --Ageo020 04:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Walter Payton photo

Hi,

FYI, you incorrectly applied the 'sportsposter' tag to a Walter Payton photo you uploaded. That tag is for posters that are promoting a sports event (upcoming). The tag is not for ordinary sports photos that happen to have been put on a poster. I removed the tag and put the 'fair use disputed' tag on the photo - as noted above, nearly all sports photos out there are not legitimate fair use on Wikipedia. Tempshill 07:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Grossman

Ah, good you've removed Smith, at least now your point is remotely defensible, if nonetheless ludicrous.

A 36 is noteworthy, when that 36 belongs to what is currently the QB of the best team in the NFL. If what you do with your life is babysit this page to make sure good information isn't added to it, you're doing a good job. Just use a spellcheck in the future, if that's the best you've got to offer...

And maybe don't reinsert any more run-on sentences, as I've already corrected a goofy knee-jerk reversion of yours in a previous edit.DBaba 04:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Olindo Mare

Why did you take the infobox out? CanbekEsen 23:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Good work on images

Hi ShadowJester. I've come across a few images tonight from which you've removed obviously fraudulent licenses tempates. Keep up the good work! If you could take things one step further in the future, please add {{subst:nld}} ("no license day") to the bottom of the description pages. This puts them on a 7-day track to deletion, and signals Orphanbot to remove it from articles and notify the uploader (in case you have not). Best regards. ×Meegs 11:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Be careful when editing

Please be careful when editing to not delete categories and interwiki links when you're intending to remove other text, as you did here in this diff on tight end: [1]. —Lowellian (reply) 09:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dustybakercub.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dustybakercub.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:36762581 0532d3df8b.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:36762581 0532d3df8b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Rory096 18:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

talk:michael jordan

why did u delete my comment on the talk page??? kathzzzz® 01:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

re:MS

well i suppose the others who made the same comment as i have should be deleted as well? kathzzzz® 02:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:TomWad.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:TomWad.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Linkin Park - Copyvio

On the web I've recently refound this article. Excuse me, but what is the problem? --Baxtaba 14:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

I should post you this

The producer of the website claimed fair use for the photos, so it wouldn't be likely that the owner took the image herself.[2] --Kzrulzuall 04:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

--Chargin' Chuck 13:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't wanna upload any LP/Bennington image. I'd only remember that the website in question contains fair-use images. --Chargin' Chuck 13:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

My bad

I noticed you edited my comment on Finfan8499's talk page sorry about that, the thing is that he doen't seem to understand that he is adding erroneous information, I posted a few times before warning him but it didn't help, anyways sorry about that-Dark Dragon Flame 23:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Bruschi Image

Just wondering if you could explain further why the image was removed. Seems like it falls under all the guidelines to be able to be posted on Wikipedia. Thanks. Pharos04 21:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Cites to NFL stats

I copy-edited the Drew Brees page and added a footnote reference to the stats pages at NFL.com. I then saw that you have removed similar references from the same spot several times already, most recently on Dec. 30 with the explanation, "Stand Alone Stat tables may not be used as sources." Can you please explain to this relative newbie: Why not? Is there a standing Wikipedia policy on this that you can point me to?

If it helps, I used the page at NFL.com that is specific to 2006 regular season statistics. Those statistics are not going to change.

The Drew Brees page really does need a lot more work. Thanks for keeping an eye on it. US 30 23:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. I noticed you're doing some major work around Wikipedia.org, especially dealing with images with licensing uncertainty. Keep up the good work, and I didn't know you like Hell's Kitchen. Maybe we should get to know each other sometime soon. - Qasamaan 21:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

GOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

SEAHAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.235.35.207 (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC).

Your edit to Talk:Slurpee

I reverted your edit. Yes, it is a pointless conversation, but you didn't remove the whole conversation. Furthermore, I'm not sure that WP:NOT applies to talk pages. WP:DFTT might apply more. I support removing the whole conversation as pointless, but I can't support your edit as it stands. --Mdwyer 20:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought User:67.175.138.202 started the discussion (I failed the see the rest of it as I was using WP Pop-Ups). I believe WP:NOT states that Wikipedia is not a discussion forum, WP:NOT#FORUM. The whole conversation is not really questioning the article, or providing any critical commentary, so it should likely be removed ;)⋅ --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  20:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I thought the original request was pretty snarky anyway. "I'm waiting..." As stupid as it is, the information gleaned from this conversations could be put into the Culteral references section of the article. Still, I wouldn't shed any tears if it went away.

What is the thinking on cleaning up talk pages? I'd love to wipe out some silly things on other pages, but I'm under the impressing that removing content from talk pages is frowned upon, especially if they are recurring themes. --Mdwyer 21:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Looney Tunes

Some stickler is making a big deal over the two images you added to MJ. The Jazz shot one is fine it has the same exact fair use rational as the Wayne Gretzky Kings signing photo so you are fine there. The movie screenshot one is fine but you need to provide the name of the production studio and a link to the source where you got it I think. Like this photo: [3] Quadzilla99 19:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)