References edit

Hi! Thanks for asking. Ideally, all statements in an article are supported by a reference. It's the best way to ensure reliability. In reality, most articles haven't achieve this ideal standard.

What I see now is that there are two "external links". I'm sure they contain some relevant information, but as they stand they're just ... there. If they were actually used in writing the article, they should be references, in order to reflect that. Again, most other articles have external links. But they should be references. If you want to improve the article further, perhaps you could incorporate them as cited references (i.e. in the <ref></ref> brackets)? Punkmorten (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply