Speedy deletion of Ozon radio edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ozon radio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 14:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

ANEM edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ANEM, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.anem.org.yu/cms/item/oanemu/en/O+nama. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

You indicated that you planned to improve this article - so, on that basis, I moved it to User:StDeepBlue/ANEM, where you can work on it some more before posting it as an article. I also removed most of the text, until you can prepare a version that does not violate copyright. As a general rule, we can't use text from other websites - but we can use the information if it is paraphrased and properly attributed to its source. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:11, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Ozon92.JPG edit

 

The file File:Ozon92.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply