Srmrt
October 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Scarborough and Ryedale mountain rescue team has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Scarborough and Ryedale mountain rescue team. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Please note that you do not own the article Scarborough and Ryedale mountain rescue team, and do not have the right to unilaterally remove all its content. Also to state that you "will be looking to create a new entry in Wikipedia" is unacceptable. You clearly have a conflict of interest here. Preferably you should not be editing the article at all, and if you do edit it you should do so only with great circumspection. Wikipedia exists to give objective third party coverage of topics, not for individuals, companies, or organisations to write their own accounts, which you can do on your own website. You have twice removed all the content from the article. If you do so again you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply edit
Yes yes, I understand. :-) But instead of taking off all content from the page, you could inform people via the talk page of the article in question, as blanking looks like vandalism. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps the best thing is if you explain on the article's talk page exactly what is wrong with the current version of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)