Sreeja Addala

November 2021

Hello, I'm Manticore. I noticed that you recently removed content from N. Ravikiran without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Manticore 09:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at N. Ravikiran, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I noticed that you recently removed content from N. Ravikiran without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. N. Shashikiran (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. N. Shashikiran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Sreeja Addala! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello @KylieTastic! The person on whom I drafted this article is an internationally acclaimed musical artiste from India, but not much about him is actually up on the internet, so I tried to research and gather information directly from him, please kindly consider accepting this draft.

Thanking you!! Sreeja Addala (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Where did you get all the content, if it was from personal knowledge it is not valid, but it it came from books, newspapers, magazine etc then they could be valid sources. Note that sources do not have to be online or in English - see reliable sources and Help:Referencing for beginners. If they really are "internationally acclaimed" and have been active and awarded in this century it's unlikely some sources would not exist - especially for awards in the last decade. Also too much is non neutral (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) words such as exceptional, vast, extremely, and just MOS:PUFFERY. KylieTastic (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:K. N. Shashikiran has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:K. N. Shashikiran. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. N. Shashikiran (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. N. Shashikiran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 08:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sreeja Addala! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Content creation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sreeja Addala. It has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. N. Shashikiran (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. N. Shashikiran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. N. Shashikiran (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WaddlesJP13 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. N. Shashikiran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:K. N. Shashikiran

Hello, Sreeja Addala. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "K. N. Shashikiran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 05:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)