Spril4

Ehrlich

This guy is obviously a hack that does not like Republicans. He cites made up controversies from left leaning newspapers in the Bob Ehrlich article. And then complains like a child when those controversies are removed by someone with an idea of what they are talking about. First off, the Walmart bill was struck down by the Courts and is already mentioned in the caption above. How is that a controversy? Secondly, none of the so called controversies involve any crimes or anything that Democrats in Maryland do not do regularly. No wrong doing was over found to have been perpetrated by the Ehrlich administration, a fact conveniently left out of this article. Get your facts straight you partisan hack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.175.133 (talk) 05:52, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Since you feel the [Robert Ehrlich] article is biased, I respecfully suggest adding reputable references which support your point of view, rather than deleting sections which have numerous citations. Cheers! Spril4 (talk) 17:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Rapidan Camp

Looks like really good quality work. Thanks for your efforts. Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia (talk) 13:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Mayalld 's proposed deletions

Interesting. Mayalld did the same thing to me today. Elan26 (talk) 19:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Elan26

For anyone wondering what this was about, see the very bottom section of [Mayalld's talk archive], as he deleted my comment regarding his proposal for speedy deletion for New Deal Cafe less than three minutes after I created it. Spril4 (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, read it, deleted it. It contained nothing that I felt was useful for the future. I am aware of your feelings on the matter, and still feel that the article is non-notable, but as I won't have the time for an AfD over the coming days, I won't be doing anything further with it. Mayalld (talk) 06:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: PG Sheriff

The history section is an oversite. The PGSO is in the middle of transferring to Chrysler Way in Upper Marlboro right off of Rt 301. Some elements of the office remain in Largo; however, because the command staff is now located in Upper Marlboro, it is the official location. I haven't checked the county website to see if it has been updated with the change. Cheers!--Sallicio^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 19:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:NewDealCafe-logo.gif)

You've uploaded File:NewDealCafe-logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Kinetic Sculpture Race

I'm contacting you because of your past edits to the Kinetic_sculpture_race page as well as the page for Hobart Brown. The KSR page has been vandalized several times in the past week with attempts to add Original Research without citations. Primarily by trying to add the name of one of Hobart's 4 children to the article, but also attempting to name one of the other page editors User:Ellin_Beltz as a financial backer for the race on a particular year. Whether or not this individual backed the race that year is irrelevant as individual donors to any of the organizations that have run the race over the years are typically anonymous. Not to mention the article they attempt to use to out this individual not only does not name them but also was written in 1999, when the large donation allegedly occurred in 2007. I'm only an amateur wiki editor and while I am passionate about Kinetics, my knowledge of many of the specifics is smaller than I would like. I've corrected what caught my attention and will be making other small edits as I locate discrepancies. I'd appreciate some help monitoring the page from someone who is better versed in both Wiki and the pertinent facts for these pages, particularly someone who is not being accused of personal involvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nytasi (talk • contribs) 07:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:CabinsTrees.gif

Thanks for uploading File:CabinsTrees.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 02:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CandyHaus2010KineticSculpture.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

KSR

Thanks for adding the 2014 Baltimore info to the KSR page. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2015 Baltimore protests page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Waves~

Great to see you active again. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Standpipe (plumbing)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Standpipe (plumbing), Spril4!

Wikipedia editor Dstone66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can't believe this didn't already exist. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Dstone66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Spril4. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spril4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Spril4. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)