You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 12:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Splitcam (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My article was not a spam! Free graphics software Category is full of such articles. Why I can't place article about my program there?Why do you think that it's a spam? The program is popular and used by more than 1 million of peoples from all over the World.

Decline reason:

Your editing was clearly intended to promote your program. If you are right in saying that there are many other spam articles, then that is a reason for deleting them, not for unblocking you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, for one writing about a subject closely related to yourself is usually a a bad idea. You didn't assert why the software is notable, and linked back to your site. Coupled with your username and your lack of any other edits to the encyclopedia that leads me to believe that you are here solely to promote your product...which tends to be borne up by your unblock request. Just because we haven't deleted other articles on similarly non notable products doesn't mean we have to keep all the future articles that solely exist to promote non-notable products (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS). Syrthiss (talk) 12:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply