Your submission at Articles for creation: Dytikou has been accepted

edit
 
Dytikou, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: PAOK Dytikou (September 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zanhe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Zanhe (talk) 07:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Spiderphalanx! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zanhe (talk) 07:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nasrat Haqparast, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nasrat Haqparast, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nasrat Haqparast, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elias Theodorou. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Elias Theodorou. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Christos Giagos. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paul Elliott (fighter)

edit
 

The article Paul Elliott (fighter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject does not meet the criteria at WP:NMMA. In my online search, I could not find any evidence he meets WP:GNG either—just websites listing basic career statistics and this short bio, which isn't significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:PAOK Dytikou concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:PAOK Dytikou, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:PAOK Dytikou

edit
 

Hello, Spiderphalanx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PAOK Dytikou".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 03:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply