November 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bengal famine of 1943. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • You can't use neews magazines and blogs and so on to cite a fact like that. They are on the thin margin of WP:RS in this case, and the sources cited already are incomparably more sound academically. Thanks for listening.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 12:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
@SpidErxD: The three sources you cited all take the 3 million figure from one book, Mukerjee 2011. You could cite that source, but before doing so please consider Talk:Bengal famine of 1943#Estimates and make your case there.
Mukerjee 2011 mentions all of the estimates outlined in footnote C. She attributes the 3 million figure to Sen 1981, who estimated between 2.7 and 3 million. The talk page argument is that in the subsequent years historians have uncovered sources that weren't available to Sen and applied different models to them, resulting in better estimates. According to Ó Gráda 2007, "today the scholarly consensus is about 2.1 million". Sen hasn't disputed the newer consensus. Some academic would have to dispute the 2.1 million figure, and with the strength of their argument persuade the academic community to shift its consensus, for Wikipedia to go with a different figure. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, SpidErxD. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, SpidErxD. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply