Sphincter boy

June 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Justin Bieber has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Justin Bieber was changed by Sphincter boy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906006 on 2013-06-24T04:46:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Bieber with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mathonius (talk) 04:47, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Atlantic Coast Conference with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Eyesnore Summer! (PC) 04:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sphincter boy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I stated true statements on the pages I edited.Sphincter boy (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's not the case for the vandalism you added to the Justin Bieber article, repeatedly. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I agree that most of your edits were fine, but it appears that you only made those edits in order for your account to become autoconfirmed, so you could then proceed to troll the Justin Bieber article. I was prepared to decline another user's request to block you (for the time being, at least) but while I was in the process of doing that, you vandalized the article yet again. Frankly, there is no magic number of good edits that makes this okay. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)