Spec24
Welcome!
Hello, Spec24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Wild Willy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 13:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
The article Wild Willy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- unremarkable product
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 13:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, please cite secondary, reliable sources (instead of primary dev sources). You can find a list of good sources at WP:VG/RS. czar 18:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Spec24, did you see this message? Your recent edits will be reverted unless you have sourcing from reliable websites (not the developers) czar 13:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Why is it necessary to have secondary sources for listings of Vive games? I can understand the need for unbiased or secondary sources when it comes to information regarding people or events, but I don't see how this applies to products. If Hasbro is making a toy I would link to the webpage of that toy, made by Hasbro. What would be the point in linking to a secondary website talking about the toy? Secondary websites may have negative reviews regarding the games. Is that proper? This is simply a listing a games available for the HTC Vive. Forgive me if the formatting of this talk page is done improperly.Spec24 (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Wild Willy 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)