Welcome! edit

Hi, I see you've just started editing an article. Please ensure that you've read and understood WP:CoI, and WP:RS and WP:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). It might also be useful for you to complete at least a minimal "user page" for youself (see mine at User:Snori an example), as statement of your background, goals and approach. All the best! - Snori (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm not trying to get into an edit war, I'm trying to update this page under the guidance of the McKenzie Institute International, and it's all voluntary work. We are just trying to update the information on there and correct several things which are actually inaccurate, which were possibly added over the years. I'm very new to this and trying to figure out all the correct ways to go about this and mean no disrespect. I will file a dispute resolution or ask for help if needed but all our edits are just going to build off the material and format that was already on here, and created by one of my colleagues years ago I believe, but update it appropriately with newer evidence-based research in an unbiased way, based on the literature that is available. Thank you

Hello. You should read WP:COI, and (since you have a conflict of interest), stop editing the article. It would be okay to make proposals at Talk:McKenzie method. If you continue edit warring, your account is likely to be blocked. Alexbrn (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months from certain pages (McKenzie method) for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (help!) 21:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note that you can still contribute at the Talk page, and discuss changes you wish to make, but these should be supported by reliable independent sources and any biomedical claims must meet the higher standard for medical sources. Guy (help!) 21:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

😂😂😂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.155.123.134 (talk) 21:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spcarp83 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Attempted to use user talk pages first, 2 separate times (please review if able) and did one undo, but understand if this is reason for block as too many edits were attempted. But hope this is no longer needed as I understand process more now. Will follow proper protocol and wish to be unblocked. Will not make any further edits at that time and will file content dispute resolution in future. Main goal is really just to update the intended page with more recent literature and appropriate information, based on evidence-based studies and updated education which numerous references have been found for and attempted to be added. Just want to do right by patients, health care providers, and others interested in content. Thank you. Spcarp83 (talk) 23:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Given your conflict of interest, I think you should stick to three months of only editing the article talk page to request changes to the article. This is especially important for subjects falling under WP:MEDRS, and it will provide you with an opportunity to prove you understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in this area. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2020 edit

  Hello, Spcarp83. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page McKenzie method, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply