South Indian Geek, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi South Indian Geek! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fertility symbol has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bahubali

edit

Sorry about the language but it is true that Bahubali is a Tollywood Telugu movie. If you don't believe me I an interview Prabhas said that Bahubali was meant for Telugu people but everybody started watching it. Ankinjago (talk) 20:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

My user page

edit

Why did you edit the the divspan column on my User page ? That was an error, but why was this done ? King Prithviraj II (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

2.0

edit

Your decision to move 2.0 to 2.o without discussion was frankly quite outrageous. Especially when it is clearly and easily provable to be wrong [1] and [2]. Admin work now must go into reverting the move. Please avoid such large changes in the future, if you are unsure. Editor 2050 (talk) 04:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Poster

edit

Regarding this edit, the poster you uploaded is not even an official poster of the film. Also, original theatrical release posters released in the country of production is preferred in the infobox. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 15:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Review aggregator website Cinechickens

edit

@South Indian Geek: I am a little bit confuse about your action against my edit. Please guide me if I am wrong. As I notice Cinechickens is the only review aggregator for Indian movies and is quite reputable. It aggregates reviews from over 40 sources including famous publications like The Times of India, NDTV, Rediff, The New York Times, etc. It is the only company in India to be able to do this. Comparatively,Rotten Tomatoes is a big review aggregator for Hollywood movies but is allowed to publish reviews from only 8-9 publications for Bollywood movies (compared to 40 publications for Cinechickens). Please reinstate Cinechickens info on Wiki. Thanks. Figwood (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not really, there do exist other review aggregators for Indian films. Rotten Tomatoes is not really useful unless about 20 reviews are counted for Indian films. Cinechickens was found by community discussion on Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force to be unreliable. If you wish, you can challenge the decision there on the talk page. I myself am quite new here and can't really "reinstate" the information as it is against consensus. Also, per WP:Review aggregators, it isn't compulsory or neither is there an obligation to list aggregators, even RT or Metacritic, if other word sources are provided. South Indian Geek (talk) 08:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanju, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

BOI

edit

BOI is not reliable site. These collections figures are manipulate so plzz don't add to any source It's my humble request Sush150 (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Box Office India was always reliable on Wikipedia. Discuss at Talk:Sanju if you wish to challenge this. South Indian Geek (talk) 16:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply