Sophiechristianson

This is Sophiechristianson's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Zackary Heart has a new comment edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Zackary Heart. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Sophiechristianson edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

User:Sophiechristianson, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sophiechristianson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Sophiechristianson during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Zackary Heart (October 31) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I spoke with you last time about this and noted how none of it was actually establishing independent notability and substance, especially considering what's listed is simply trivial and unconvincing sources, not quite the in-depth third-party substance news we need; therefore remember please no press releases, trivial passing mentions, interviews, and there's also no inherited notability from anyone or anything else.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Zackary Heart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic