Sooryaman
Welcome! edit
Hello, Sooryaman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rickyurs (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi Sooryaman! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:18, Friday, September 27, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi Sooryaman! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:41, Friday, September 27, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
September 2019 edit
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ohh. Am not going into no war. Wasnt aware of the same. Have just started with this a day back. Thanks for highlighting MrOllie. A quick Q. So if any article we need to cite, would only paper published journals/sources be added. Webcontent from a strong source is not to be accounted, is it? Do let me know. Will have it cited correctly, accordingly. Thanks.
- Hi MrOllie can you look at this link - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029960/ and help me know if this makes correct citing. Am adding a synopsis of what i wanted to convey which is cleared by these words from the report "Wigs are widely used as a treatment option for chemotherapy-induced alopecia, advanced androgenetic alopecia, and severe AA1,5,6,7. A wig worn by a patient with alopecia for treatment purposes is not merely ornamental, but a necessity for daily life, similar to a prosthesis used by a patient who has lost a leg or an eye. Hence, it is called a “scalp or hair prosthesis” to differentiate it from a fashion wig. According to study based on a questionnaire, Jang and Bae8 concluded that wearing a wig not only helps with chemotherapy, but also enhances patients' self-esteem, provides mental stability, and helps patients lead a normal social life." Sooryaman (talk) 15:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Advanced Hair Studio edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Advanced Hair Studio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thjarkur Can you kindly get me my content back so i can improve upon it. The content was not meant for advertising. If you seem to believe it to be violation of some guidelines kindly let me access to the content so I can improvise upon it. Leading to your deletion of my 2nd article resulted into my 1st article improvement which was genuine piece of addition to existing article has also been reverted. awaiting a response on the same. Am new to these tasks but am seriously wanting to contribute my knowhow.Sooryaman (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 13:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Sooryaman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
am genuinely looking to contribute my understanding of the industry. I would honestly want to do value addition. I am learning through the process of the wikipedia working hence would request to be allowed to work upon the same be it small tasks. If you can help would be great. Thanks.Sooryaman (talk) 13:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Thank you for the offer of your contributions, but we have enough promotional edit-warriors already. I suggest you try elsewhere.Yunshui 雲水 14:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sooryaman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
the reason is as follows. The way 雲 had mentioned it is a subtle way of showing the door which is in a way offensive. I would request this to be reconsidered as I can make sure that the industry content can be taken up as contributions and I can remain away from any content addition which may seem to come under promotional content. Sooryaman (talk) 10:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't wish to unblock you to continue to edit about things related to your conflict of interest. If you want to edit about other subjects for which you have no conflict of interest, please say what those are. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MER-C I had tried to be a contributor at genuine level. My 1st article improvement on Management_of_hairloss pertaining to non-surgical options was indeed a genuine addition. It was not advertising which you have revoked. If you think there is violation of policy kindly give me access to my content and I can make improvements. regards.Sooryaman (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- It's an odd coincidence that the only company you mentioned in that edit is the one you created a promotional article on. I can't imagine why that may be... MER-C 14:19, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- It's more than a coincidence due to the following points. I have been in this industry. My contention is to have the Non-Surgical option as being a part of the Management_of_hairloss. There was no intention of promoting any company under the same The reason that Hair club and Advanced Hair I had listed in the organisations is that these two I found on the web which are available for servicing across the world. After the article improvement got accepted I came across the fact that there was already page available for Hair club but the one for Advanced Hair Studio was already deleted. I just got the same worked upon it. Hence I would still recommend that, the 1st article could still be kept active. If you feel you could remove the companies names from the last set. I would request you to help me remain as a contributor for this industry segment. MER-CSooryaman (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Sooryaman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can 331dot help me understand how a person can edit and add value to the body of information such where the contributor is not having information on. Regarding edits and updates being done I have shared previously also that I will add content without having done the mistake of content going in the line of promotion or advertising. I have already put in request to one of the initial rejecting editor/admin MER-C that if needed let the name of the organisations be removed, as on primary point also when I mentioned it in my 1st article it was not planned in that fashion. I am looking to contribute on anything that is of value in the field of my knowledge. A contribution I believe can be done only on parameters that one know about. I hope you and the general population is in agreement to this fact. Request you to kindly let me know what can be done on this front. Regards. Sooryaman (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No thanks. Talk page access revoked due to the concerns raised. Yamla (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I recommend the withdrawal of talk page access per WP:PAYTALK and WP:IDHT. I find your repeated pingings to be disruptive. MER-C 14:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)