Sonnywynn

This is Sonnywynn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Sonnywynn! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 5)

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interesting man? Yes. But the referencing is woefully inadequate.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sonnywynn/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Sonnywynn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

You emailed me

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I am not allowed to copy that email here. If I answer your points in detail that is also problematic. You have asked me for help, though.

A book is a useful reference provided it is independent of the subject, is not self published, and has significant coverage within it of the subject of the article.

For precise notability criteria, please see WP:NPOL,

You need to read WP:COI and to make correct declarations about yours.

A biography of a close relative is the hardest article to create except for an autobiography. I suggest you read this essay, one of many on article creation.It contains the process to follow to be successful, assuming success to be achievable. You should also read HELP:YFA.

You also need to read WP:CITE and WP:REFB. We do not use references in headings; we use them to cite specific points and facts.

I conduct all Wikipedia correspondence in plain sight unless there are privacy or security implications. If you need further help please either use {{Reply to}} as a reply to this thread or leave me a message on my own talk page. I will be happy to offer guidance. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The draft is now at Draft:Moe Nyo U Ko Ko Gyi 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moe Nyo U Ko Ko Gyi (November 2)

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still improperly sourced. All information in the body should have a source. (e.g. you need to source his involvement in BIA)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moe Nyo U Ko Ko Gyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 20:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic