Somody
Somody (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Alright, I understand what you're saying and I agree fully. However, is there not anything I can do to get this account unbanned? As I said before, this is practically my username for everything. If it can't be unbanned, could I get the account deleted so that I can start one with the same name? I'm sure if you put some work into this you could see that it wasn't even my laptop/IP that made the edits in question, but my brother's as I've mentioned before (even though it appears nobody believes me). So tell me right now whether this account will be unblocked or whether you will lose a contributor forever.
Decline reason:
Per Jayron and Hersfold. Given the large number of warnings you received, I find it incredible that you didn't notice the number of warnings on your talk page regarding your "brother's" edits. Talk page disabled. Blueboy96 03:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Somody (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
That link was quite humourous and I do appreciate the addition. This situation, however, is not at all humourous. Contrary to what you may think, it was indeed my brother. Though I cannot prove it, I'd hope you'll give me the benefit of the doubt. To be honest, I've only ever noticed one other warning (I'm not in the habit of checking my talk page) and that was also caused by my brother. In fact, now that I review my contributions, it seems that he's had access to my account numerous times without my knowledge. I would appreciate if you could reenable my account so that I can constructively edit articles. I guess I could make a new account if this is too much to ask, but I'd rather not because I like this username (my last name). Thank you for your consideration and I hope you do the right think and give this account another chance. Good day. somody (talk) 00:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given that this account is compromised, by your own admission, I think it would be unsafe to unblock it all. Jayron32 03:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Somody (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
These unconstructive edits were done by my younger (and immature) brother. I'm very sorry for the measures you had to take. Since it wasn't me, is it possible to restore my account or should I open a new one?
Decline reason:
You're responsible for the edits of your account. Also, considering the large number of warnings you received, how is it you never noticed your younger brother was abusing your account (assuming that's the case)? Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Looks to me like this account has persistently been abused over the past year or so; at some point, the question begs itself whether this is "your" account anymore, given an apparent lack of will (or lack of ability) to keep it secure. Still, if you want us to take you seriously, you need to log out when you're done using the site and keep other people from using this account. Still, though, I do have some sympathy for your situation, and I for one would tentatively support giving you one last chance, on this account or another you create, with the clear understanding that any "mistakes" with the login will more than likely lead to immediate and indefinite reblocking. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- There was an indefinite block placed on the account after a vandalism spree including a strong personal attack against an admin (see users deleted contributions) in January. The block was lifted after a "email discussion". The user must have known the account was being used for vandalism at that stage in order to have the discussion about unblocking via email and in my opinion the lifting of that block at was the last chance. Camw (talk) 04:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Somody (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I forgot to mention that I've changed all my passwords as well as my master password for Firefox. If you can accept this as repent enough for what has happened with my account, please give my account one last chance and unblock it. I beg of you. Thank you very much! somody (talk) 03:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See WP:GOTHACKED. Sandstein 09:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block type edit
I'd just like to point out that this user seems to be under the impression that he will be able to create and edit from a new account. That seems contrary to sockpuppet policy, and my understanding is that it's also not possible with this type of block. Perhaps this should be clarified to the user, unless I'm mistaken. Equazcion (talk) 03:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Radhakant Bajpai listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Radhakant Bajpai. Since you had some involvement with the Radhakant Bajpai redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Elektra (smartcard) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 15:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)