Welcome!

edit
Welcome to Wikipedia!
SomerIsland!
     
I've noticed some of your contributions and I want to say hello!
Have a look at the links below if you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:
  Introduction   Navigating Wikipedia   Editing Wikipedia articles
  The Five Pillars of Wikipedia   Writing your very first article   HELP ME!
Here are some of the basic Wikipedia policies that you should be aware of:
  Be BOLD!   Assume good faith   Be civil and polite
  Don't infringe copyright   Vandals aren't nice   Don't get blocked
If you need any more help, visit the Teahouse for friendly help from other editors, or go on the Wikipedia Adventure for a fun and interactive way of learning about Wikipedia.
And if you still have unanswered questions, click this link to ask a question, and someone will come to help you soon.

Cyclone Toby 00:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Andy Ngo

edit

SomerIsland, the content you restored here [[1]] is disputed text. Per NOCON you shouldn't restore the disputed text until you have made a case for why it should be included and consensus for inclusion has been shown. Can you say why this disputed content was restored? Springee (talk) 05:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can you weigh in on a non-alignment

edit

as you have helped edit the Reverse Discrimination page, would you mind at the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Reverse_discrimination#Blumrosen_report

reviewing the thread, and see if you can weigh in on the debate, if disclosure on the funding and mandate of the research should be succinctly included? Cowwaw (talk01:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply