User talk:SomeoneIguess/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
October 2020
A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. ―Susmuffin Talk 21:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Panorama (British TV programme). 331dot (talk) 09:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to WAP (song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: WAP (song) was changed by Just some random dude with a pc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951713 on 2020-11-17T20:01:51+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Just some random dude with a pc! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 19:46, Thursday, January 14, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
im a dumb, from myself
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Just some random dude with a pc/rawr x3
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Just some random dude with a pc/rawr x3. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Huggums537 (talk) 08:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
A goat for you!
baaaaaa!
Sliderandtheotters (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| good xnopyt you got here Sliderandtheotters (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
yassss
Sliderandtheotters (talk) 17:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC) |
from the guy that copied your userboxes
yes i did, sorry...
Sliderandtheotters (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
not really
--Sliderandtheotters (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2022
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Douglas X-3 Stiletto: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. WindTempos (talk • contribs) 01:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! 01:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Userbox request
I want the UBX to say "This user has a fear of the duck"
Where it says "Fear of the duck" should wikilink to Fear of the Dark (song) (cuz I'm a Iron Maiden fan) Angerxiety (talk) 20:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- sorry im so late lol
This user has a fear of the duck.
{{User:SomeoneIguess/fearoftheduck}}
Someone, i guess(talk i guess)
17:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the Userbox
I already made the userbox though and didn't realize you made it (apparently 5 months ago too)
Still, thanks. Angerxiety 00:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- I had just gone on a wikibreak a day or two before the request so i got to it really late lol, sorry about that :P 00:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Edit warring at Algorithm page
Your recent editing history at Algorithm shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:196:180:DC0:7C5A:37CB:A8C6:32D7 (talk) 02:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- User:ArcAngel What's your two cents? 02:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Help with finding an 'archived copy' of a youtube video ...
How do I do that ? 24.161.66.164 (talk) 00:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not an archive of the video, an archive of the original link. Archives such as the Wayback Machine are heavily recommended. Someone, i guess(talk i guess|le edit list) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The original link (well, a mirror of the original, the original is a dead link) is a relatively meaningless "factoid" (their word) in a computer magazine that does not exist in its original form and that says no more than the source of the link. The youtube video, however, captures the EXACT reference. Sure, it is probably not going to be a permanent reference but it is way better than an already dead link that did not explicate the source at all. Can't let "perfect be the enemy of the good" etc... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.66.164 (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
It is not article luckily someone fixed it
yay Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 03:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
nice userpage man
imjust existing (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to St. George, Louisiana, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm confused. The link appears to be a redlink and looking through my contributions it appeared you had removed some citations without an edit reason. The action was done with UltraViolet which does not provide an option to preview. Someone, i guess(talk i guess|le edit list) 04:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- The "citations" were just inline external links and references to other wikipedia articles, and I removed the entry from the "Notable People" section because those sections are not supposed to include redlinked entries. Maybe you should switch to a tool that gives the option, or just edit manually. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, understood. Someone, i guess(talk i guess|le edit list) 04:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- The "citations" were just inline external links and references to other wikipedia articles, and I removed the entry from the "Notable People" section because those sections are not supposed to include redlinked entries. Maybe you should switch to a tool that gives the option, or just edit manually. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)