User talk:Soman/Archives/2014/March

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Miyagawa in topic WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

  1.   Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
  2.   Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
  3.   WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Seydou Cissokho

  Hello! Your submission of Seydou Cissokho at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lihaas (talk) 16:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Soman, it's been over a week since this was posted. Please stop by the nomination template. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unity for Socialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Indian State Assembly Election Results (1951)

 

A tag has been placed on Indian State Assembly Election Results (1951) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logical1004 (talk) 07:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

File:115-unidadepovo.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:115-unidadepovo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Orpcml.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Orpcml.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

DYK for Unity for Socialism

Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:115-unidadepovo.PNG

 

Thanks for uploading File:115-unidadepovo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Orpcml.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Orpcml.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Purnendu Dastidar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ayub Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Liberal and Conservative communists VS Hardline and Moderate communists?

In the article 1965 Bulgarian Coup d'état attempt, you removed the words "liberal" when describing Todor Zhivkov and "conservative" when describing Mao Zedong. Conservatives "seek to preserve things as they are" and "oppose modernism". Isn't that an accurate description of Mao in the face of the reforms proposed by Nikita Khrushchev in the USSR? And therefore wasn't Khrushchev and therefore (at least in 1965) Zhivkov a liberal for lessening central control and increasing freedoms somewhat more than the rigid Stalin?

Or perhaps a better description might be "Hardline" and "Moderate" communists?

What is you opinion?

Kndimov (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I know that it is common, in particular with how events around 1989-1991 in USSR and Socialist Bloc, to label pro-Soviet hardliners as 'conservatives', and reformists as 'liberal'. But for encyclopedia it's better to use terms that avoid the risk of confusion with the distinct ideologies of liberalism and conservatism. Furthermore, in the 1960s, the Maoist challenge wasn't conservative but rather a radical (often younger) force than the established pro-Soviet leaderships. I think 'hardline' and 'moderate' would be better terms in this context. --Soman (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your input! -- Kndimov (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks to you as well, it is a very interesting article. --Soman (talk) 23:44, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Seydou Cissokho

The DYK project (nominate) 02:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Kamgar Kisan Paksha

The DYK project (nominate) 01:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for S.K. Limaye

The DYK project (nominate) 08:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

Women's History Month edit-a-thon

I saw your edit(s) to the articles listed for Women's History Month (India) ! Thank you for your contributions! Please consider signing up on the event page and help us create new articles about notable Indian women. Thanks! Netha (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Communist Party of India (Marxist) candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Left Front and People's Democracy
List of Left Front candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Left Front

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Malayin

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

IGE 2014

there is a message for you on Talk:Indian_general_election,_2014#Infobox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khushank94 (talkcontribs) 03:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Communist Party of India (Marxist) candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • thumb|[[P.R. Natarajan]], CPI(M) candidate in [[Coimbatore (Lok Sabha constituency)|Coimbatore]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Third Front (India) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Bahujan Samaj Party]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Communist Party of India (Marxist) candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | align="center"| 1 || [[Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Lok Sabha constituency)|Andaman and Nicobar Islands] || align="center"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for All People's Party (Assam)

Materialscientist (talk) 09:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer   Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist   Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato.   Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC) |}